1994PubMedRequires access

Choice of characteristics and their bioequivalence ranges for the comparison of absorption rates of immediate-release drug formulations.

Robert Schall, H. G. Luus, V W Steinijans, Dieter Hauschke

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

For immediate release drug formulations the maximum concentration (Cmax), the time to the maximum concentration (tmax), and the ratio Cmax/AUC have been suggested as absorption rate characteristics. Although tmax is easier to interpret as absorption rate characteristic than Cmax and Cmax/AUC, the latter are generally preferred in practice because these characteristics can be observed with higher precision, and are easier to handle statistically than tmax. In this paper we propose a strategy for setting appropriate bioequivalence ranges for tmax and Cmax/AUC, and for choosing the best characteristic for the comparison of absorption rates when planning a bioequivalence study. This involves motivating the bioequivalence range on that scale which is most convenient for that purpose, namely in terms of differences in tmax. Exploiting the pharmacokinetic relationship between tmax and Cmax/AUC this bioequivalence range is then translated into the corresponding bioequivalence range for Cmax/AUC. The characteristic that gives the greatest power to show bioequivalence can then be specified as the primary absorption rate characteristic. For drugs with short elimination half-lives, or short fastest disposition half-lives if the drug concentrations follow a higher compartmental model, Cmax/AUC is the best characteristic, but for drugs with long elimination or fastest disposition half-lives tmax can be superior to Cmax/AUC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For immediate release drug formulations the maximum concentration (Cmax), the time to the maximum concentration (tmax), and the ratio Cmax/AUC have been suggested as absorption rate characteristics. Although tmax is easier to interpret as absorption rate characteristic than Cmax and Cmax/AUC, the latter are generally preferred in practice because these characteristics can be observed with higher precision, and are easier to handle statistically than tmax. In this paper we propose a strategy for setting appropriate bioequivalence ranges for tmax and Cmax/AUC, and for choosing the best characteristic for the comparison of absorption rates when planning a bioequivalence study. This involves motivating the bioequivalence range on that scale which is most convenient for that purpose, namely in terms of differences in tmax. Exploiting the pharmacokinetic relationship between tmax and Cmax/AUC this bioequivalence range is then translated into the corresponding bioequivalence range for Cmax/AUC. The characteristic that gives the greatest power to show bioequivalence can then be specified as the primary absorption rate characteristic. For drugs with short elimination half-lives, or short fastest disposition half-lives if the drug concentrations follow a higher compartmental model, Cmax/AUC is the best characteristic, but for drugs with long elimination or fastest disposition half-lives tmax can be superior to Cmax/AUC.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For immediate release drug formulations the maximum concentration (Cmax), the time to the maximum concentration (tmax), and the ratio Cmax/AUC have been suggested as absorption rate characteristics. Although tmax is easier to interpret as absorption rate characteristic than Cmax and Cmax/AUC, the latter are generally preferred in practice because these characteristics can be observed with higher precision, and are easier to handle statistically than tmax. In this paper we propose a strategy for setting appropriate bioequivalence ranges for tmax and Cmax/AUC, and for choosing the best characteristic for the comparison of absorption rates when planning a bioequivalence study. This involves motivating the bioequivalence range on that scale which is most convenient for that purpose, namely in terms of differences in tmax. Exploiting the pharmacokinetic relationship between tmax and Cmax/AUC this bioequivalence range is then translated into the corresponding bioequivalence range for Cmax/AUC. The characteristic that gives the greatest power to show bioequivalence can then be specified as the primary absorption rate characteristic. For drugs with short elimination half-lives, or short fastest disposition half-lives if the drug concentrations follow a higher compartmental model, Cmax/AUC is the best characteristic, but for drugs with long elimination or fastest disposition half-lives tmax can be superior to Cmax/AUC.

Key concepts: Cmax, Bioequivalence, Pharmacokinetics, Absorption (acoustics), Pharmacology, Chemistry, Medicine, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Choice of characteristics and their bioequivalence ranges for the comparison of absorption rates of immediate-release drug formulations. — Research Paper | ScholarLens