1981•Scholarship @ Cornell Law (Cornell University)Requires access

Bankruptcy Law in Perspective

Theodore A. Eisenberg

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The new bankruptcy act is a failure. Its shortcomings show that we need to change the way we think about bankruptcy law. The problem is not so much with the new bankruptcy act's treatment of any specific issue, though larger problems manifest themselves through questionable specific provisions. Rather, the problem is the way in which bankruptcy law is perceived as an area separate from the rest of the legal world. In many respects the new bankruptcy act inadequately reflects bankruptcy law's existence as part of a legal structure that includes many other federal laws, a Constitution, and detailed treatment of debtor-creditor issues by over fifty jurisdictions. This Article explores the narrow limits within which bankruptcy reform operates and the prominence of these limits in the new act.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The new bankruptcy act is a failure. Its shortcomings show that we need to change the way we think about bankruptcy law. The problem is not so much with the new bankruptcy act's treatment of any specific issue, though larger problems manifest themselves through questionable specific provisions. Rather, the problem is the way in which bankruptcy law is perceived as an area separate from the rest of the legal world. In many respects the new bankruptcy act inadequately reflects bankruptcy law's existence as part of a legal structure that includes many other federal laws, a Constitution, and detailed treatment of debtor-creditor issues by over fifty jurisdictions. This Article explores the narrow limits within which bankruptcy reform operates and the prominence of these limits in the new act.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The new bankruptcy act is a failure. Its shortcomings show that we need to change the way we think about bankruptcy law. The problem is not so much with the new bankruptcy act's treatment of any specific issue, though larger problems manifest themselves through questionable specific provisions. Rather, the problem is the way in which bankruptcy law is perceived as an area separate from the rest of the legal world. In many respects the new bankruptcy act inadequately reflects bankruptcy law's existence as part of a legal structure that includes many other federal laws, a Constitution, and detailed treatment of debtor-creditor issues by over fifty jurisdictions. This Article explores the narrow limits within which bankruptcy reform operates and the prominence of these limits in the new act.

Key concepts: Bankruptcy, Perspective (graphical), Law, Law and economics, Business, Economics, Political science, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bankruptcy Law in Perspective — Research Paper | ScholarLens