2005ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University)Requires access

The economic, medical and social costs of road traffic crashes in rural north Queensland: a 5 year multi-phase study

Craig Veitch, Mary C. Sheehan, Richard Turner, Vic Siskind, Dennis Pashen

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

[Extract] People living in rural and remote regions of Australia are significantly over-represented in road transport-related fatality and injury figures. The costs of these events are also significantly higher than for similar injuries in urban communities. In Queensland in the year 2000, for example, the risk of dying (per capita) in a rural versus urban crash was 4.2 times higher, with costs 2–3 times higher in rural areas compared to urban areas. Additionally, Indigenous Australians are highly over-represented in road crash statistics. Despite rural populations being over-represented in road transport-related crashes both nationally and internationally, very few road safety policies and interventions have targeted rural and remote populations and problems. “The rural and remote road safety problem has received minimal attention in comparison to the efforts directed at reducing crashes in urban areas” primarily due to population distribution. Policy makers stand to reap bigger returns for dollars invested in urban areas, while the cost of conducting research in rural areas is substantially higher. Likewise, little research has focused on the social, economic and medical costs of non-urban crashes.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Extract] People living in rural and remote regions of Australia are significantly over-represented in road transport-related fatality and injury figures. The costs of these events are also significantly higher than for similar injuries in urban communities. In Queensland in the year 2000, for example, the risk of dying (per capita) in a rural versus urban crash was 4.2 times higher, with costs 2–3 times higher in rural areas compared to urban areas. Additionally, Indigenous Australians are highly over-represented in road crash statistics. Despite rural populations being over-represented in road transport-related crashes both nationally and internationally, very few road safety policies and interventions have targeted rural and remote populations and problems. “The rural and remote road safety problem has received minimal attention in comparison to the efforts directed at reducing crashes in urban areas” primarily due to population distribution. Policy makers stand to reap bigger returns for dollars invested in urban areas, while the cost of conducting research in rural areas is substantially higher. Likewise, little research has focused on the social, economic and medical costs of non-urban crashes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Extract] People living in rural and remote regions of Australia are significantly over-represented in road transport-related fatality and injury figures. The costs of these events are also significantly higher than for similar injuries in urban communities. In Queensland in the year 2000, for example, the risk of dying (per capita) in a rural versus urban crash was 4.2 times higher, with costs 2–3 times higher in rural areas compared to urban areas. Additionally, Indigenous Australians are highly over-represented in road crash statistics. Despite rural populations being over-represented in road transport-related crashes both nationally and internationally, very few road safety policies and interventions have targeted rural and remote populations and problems. “The rural and remote road safety problem has received minimal attention in comparison to the efforts directed at reducing crashes in urban areas” primarily due to population distribution. Policy makers stand to reap bigger returns for dollars invested in urban areas, while the cost of conducting research in rural areas is substantially higher. Likewise, little research has focused on the social, economic and medical costs of non-urban crashes.

Key concepts: Crash, Rural area, Per capita, Geography, Socioeconomics, Population, Economic cost, Psychological intervention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The economic, medical and social costs of road traffic crashes in rural north Queensland: a 5 year multi-phase study — Research Paper | ScholarLens