2007•Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)Open access

Immigrants' Rights in the Courts and Congress: Constitutional Protections and the Rule of Law After 9/11

Lucas Guttentag

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

We all witnessed the astonishing demonstrations across the country in the spring of 2006. We watched with surprise as legislation recently was passed by the U.S. Senate to address a dysfunctional immigration system. The so-called comprehensive immigration reform bill held out the promise of legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants and suggested it would do something for the additional millions who are stuck in an immigration backlog despite being eligible for legal status. That was the hope, but it also camouflaged grave deficiencies. My goal is to draw attention to some of those shortcomings, to put them into the context of 9/11 and recent legislation as well as our historic attitudes, and to focus on the essential need to preserve and restore effective judicial review as a cornerstone of immigrants’ rights.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We all witnessed the astonishing demonstrations across the country in the spring of 2006. We watched with surprise as legislation recently was passed by the U.S. Senate to address a dysfunctional immigration system. The so-called comprehensive immigration reform bill held out the promise of legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants and suggested it would do something for the additional millions who are stuck in an immigration backlog despite being eligible for legal status. That was the hope, but it also camouflaged grave deficiencies. My goal is to draw attention to some of those shortcomings, to put them into the context of 9/11 and recent legislation as well as our historic attitudes, and to focus on the essential need to preserve and restore effective judicial review as a cornerstone of immigrants’ rights.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We all witnessed the astonishing demonstrations across the country in the spring of 2006. We watched with surprise as legislation recently was passed by the U.S. Senate to address a dysfunctional immigration system. The so-called comprehensive immigration reform bill held out the promise of legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants and suggested it would do something for the additional millions who are stuck in an immigration backlog despite being eligible for legal status. That was the hope, but it also camouflaged grave deficiencies. My goal is to draw attention to some of those shortcomings, to put them into the context of 9/11 and recent legislation as well as our historic attitudes, and to focus on the essential need to preserve and restore effective judicial review as a cornerstone of immigrants’ rights.

Key concepts: Law, Political science, Immigration, Rule of law, Exclusionary rule, Supreme court, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Immigrants' Rights in the Courts and Congress: Constitutional Protections and the Rule of Law After 9/11 — Research Paper | ScholarLens