Structural Weight Comparison of a Joined Wing and a Conventional Wing
Mary Fairchild Samuels
Abstract
Mary Fairchild Samuels
Abstract
A structural weight comparison was made between a new concept wing design, called a Joined Wing, and a reference conventional wing-plus-horizontal tail (Boeing 727). The joined-wing analysis includes two cases that differ only in minimum gage skin thickness. The comparison was accomplished by constructing finite-element computer models of each wing configuration, analyzing each for optimum skin thickness, then determining the structural weight of each wing. The optimizations were based on a fully stressed design concept using a Von Mises criterion for maximum allowable stress. The joined wing was found to be lighter by 12-22%.
OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A structural weight comparison was made between a new concept wing design, called a Joined Wing, and a reference conventional wing-plus-horizontal tail (Boeing 727). The joined-wing analysis includes two cases that differ only in minimum gage skin thickness. The comparison was accomplished by constructing finite-element computer models of each wing configuration, analyzing each for optimum skin thickness, then determining the structural weight of each wing. The optimizations were based on a fully stressed design concept using a Von Mises criterion for maximum allowable stress. The joined wing was found to be lighter by 12-22%.
Key concepts: Wing, Wing configuration, Minimum weight, Structural engineering, Wing loading, Finite element method, Swept wing, Washout