2012Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School)Requires access

The Unexplored Impact of IPv6 on Intrusion Detection Systems

Keith A Gehrke

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

With DoD networks steadily adopting and transitioning to the next generation Internet Protocol, IPv6, careful consideration must be given to IPv6-specific implications on network protection. While Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) assist in protecting current IPv4 DoD networks, NIDS performance in operational DoD IPv6 environments is largely unknown. As a step toward more rigorous NIDS evaluation, we investigate the extent to which known IPv4 attacks are able to evade detection when converted to equivalent IPv6 attacks. Utilizing 13 general attack classes, we test the IPv6 readiness of two popular open source NIDSs: SNORT and BRO. Attacks in each class are evaluated in a virtual test bed that models both “native” and “transitional” networks. In the native IPv6 environment, we achieve a 95% detection rate for SNORT as compared to 8% with BRO. In addition, we discover a bug in SNORT where a carefully crafted IPv6 packet causes the NIDS to fail open, allowing full circumvention. Our findings suggest that, with respect to IPv6, both NIDS signatures and NIDS software require additional testing and evaluation to be operationally ready.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

With DoD networks steadily adopting and transitioning to the next generation Internet Protocol, IPv6, careful consideration must be given to IPv6-specific implications on network protection. While Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) assist in protecting current IPv4 DoD networks, NIDS performance in operational DoD IPv6 environments is largely unknown. As a step toward more rigorous NIDS evaluation, we investigate the extent to which known IPv4 attacks are able to evade detection when converted to equivalent IPv6 attacks. Utilizing 13 general attack classes, we test the IPv6 readiness of two popular open source NIDSs: SNORT and BRO. Attacks in each class are evaluated in a virtual test bed that models both “native” and “transitional” networks. In the native IPv6 environment, we achieve a 95% detection rate for SNORT as compared to 8% with BRO. In addition, we discover a bug in SNORT where a carefully crafted IPv6 packet causes the NIDS to fail open, allowing full circumvention. Our findings suggest that, with respect to IPv6, both NIDS signatures and NIDS software require additional testing and evaluation to be operationally ready.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

With DoD networks steadily adopting and transitioning to the next generation Internet Protocol, IPv6, careful consideration must be given to IPv6-specific implications on network protection. While Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) assist in protecting current IPv4 DoD networks, NIDS performance in operational DoD IPv6 environments is largely unknown. As a step toward more rigorous NIDS evaluation, we investigate the extent to which known IPv4 attacks are able to evade detection when converted to equivalent IPv6 attacks. Utilizing 13 general attack classes, we test the IPv6 readiness of two popular open source NIDSs: SNORT and BRO. Attacks in each class are evaluated in a virtual test bed that models both “native” and “transitional” networks. In the native IPv6 environment, we achieve a 95% detection rate for SNORT as compared to 8% with BRO. In addition, we discover a bug in SNORT where a carefully crafted IPv6 packet causes the NIDS to fail open, allowing full circumvention. Our findings suggest that, with respect to IPv6, both NIDS signatures and NIDS software require additional testing and evaluation to be operationally ready.

Key concepts: IPv6, IPv4, Intrusion detection system, Internet Protocol, IPv6 address, Computer science, Computer security, Network packet

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Unexplored Impact of IPv6 on Intrusion Detection Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens