2006AIP conference proceedingsRequires access

Quality Imaging — Comparison of CR Mammography with Screen-Film Mammography

Enrique Gaona, J. Azorín Nieto, J. A. I. Díaz Góngora, Manuel Arreola, Gustavo Casian Castellanos, Gerardo M. Perdigón Castañeda, Jesús Gabriel Franco Enríquez

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The aim of this work is a quality imaging comparison of CR mammography images printed to film by a laser printer with screen‐film mammography. A Giotto and Elscintec dedicated mammography units with fully automatic exposure and a nominal large focal spot size of 0.3 mm were used for the image acquisition of phantoms in screen‐film mammography. Four CR mammography units from two different manufacturers and three dedicated x‐ray mammography units with fully automatic exposure and a nominal large focal spot size of 0.3 mm were used for the image acquisition of phantoms in CR mammography. The tests quality image included an assessment of system resolution, scoring phantom images, Artifacts, mean optical density and density difference (contrast). In this study, screen‐film mammography with a quality control program offers a significantly greater level of quality image relative to CR mammography images printed on film.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this work is a quality imaging comparison of CR mammography images printed to film by a laser printer with screen‐film mammography. A Giotto and Elscintec dedicated mammography units with fully automatic exposure and a nominal large focal spot size of 0.3 mm were used for the image acquisition of phantoms in screen‐film mammography. Four CR mammography units from two different manufacturers and three dedicated x‐ray mammography units with fully automatic exposure and a nominal large focal spot size of 0.3 mm were used for the image acquisition of phantoms in CR mammography. The tests quality image included an assessment of system resolution, scoring phantom images, Artifacts, mean optical density and density difference (contrast). In this study, screen‐film mammography with a quality control program offers a significantly greater level of quality image relative to CR mammography images printed on film.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this work is a quality imaging comparison of CR mammography images printed to film by a laser printer with screen‐film mammography. A Giotto and Elscintec dedicated mammography units with fully automatic exposure and a nominal large focal spot size of 0.3 mm were used for the image acquisition of phantoms in screen‐film mammography. Four CR mammography units from two different manufacturers and three dedicated x‐ray mammography units with fully automatic exposure and a nominal large focal spot size of 0.3 mm were used for the image acquisition of phantoms in CR mammography. The tests quality image included an assessment of system resolution, scoring phantom images, Artifacts, mean optical density and density difference (contrast). In this study, screen‐film mammography with a quality control program offers a significantly greater level of quality image relative to CR mammography images printed on film.

Key concepts: Mammography, Imaging phantom, Image quality, Computer science, Image resolution, Quality (philosophy), Materials science, Medical physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quality Imaging — Comparison of CR Mammography with Screen-Film Mammography — Research Paper | ScholarLens