2003Unpublished venueRequires access

A COST RECOVERY SYSTEM FOR SPEED AND RED-LIGHT CAMERAS - TWO YEAR PILOT EVALUATION

A Gains, R Humble, B.J. Heydecker, S.S.J. Robertson

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

In April 2000, a cost recovery system for speed and red-light cameras was introduced in eight pilot areas in England, Wales and Scotland. The eight areas were selected to represent a range of geographies, casualty reduction strategies and enforcement technologies. In the first two years of operations, the following results have been achieved: (1) Speed is down. Based on a large number of speed surveys vehicle speeds have dropped following the introduction of both fixed site and mobile speed cameras. The reduction in speed has been greatest in urban areas. (2) Casualties are down. Where cameras were introduced, there has been a statistically significant reduction in casualties. The greatest reduction has been in killed and serious casualties. The number of pedestrian casualties has also fallen significantly. In the last two years, killed and serious casualties at camera sites have fallen by 35% compared to the longterm trend. In terms of enforcement technology, fixed site cameras have had the greatest impact (65% reduction), and mobile speed cameras have also proved effective (29% reduction). Cameras appear to be equally effective in urban and rural areas. (3) Public reaction has been positive. Public attitude surveys indicated that the majority of the public support targeted camera enforcement. There has been significant demand locally for enforcement. In the two years of the pilot operation there have been important lessons learned that should inform future decisions on camera enforcement. In this report, the authors set out the results from the pilot areas and assess the implications for speed and red-light camera enforcement in the future.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In April 2000, a cost recovery system for speed and red-light cameras was introduced in eight pilot areas in England, Wales and Scotland. The eight areas were selected to represent a range of geographies, casualty reduction strategies and enforcement technologies. In the first two years of operations, the following results have been achieved: (1) Speed is down. Based on a large number of speed surveys vehicle speeds have dropped following the introduction of both fixed site and mobile speed cameras. The reduction in speed has been greatest in urban areas. (2) Casualties are down. Where cameras were introduced, there has been a statistically significant reduction in casualties. The greatest reduction has been in killed and serious casualties. The number of pedestrian casualties has also fallen significantly. In the last two years, killed and serious casualties at camera sites have fallen by 35% compared to the longterm trend. In terms of enforcement technology, fixed site cameras have had the greatest impact (65% reduction), and mobile speed cameras have also proved effective (29% reduction). Cameras appear to be equally effective in urban and rural areas. (3) Public reaction has been positive. Public attitude surveys indicated that the majority of the public support targeted camera enforcement. There has been significant demand locally for enforcement. In the two years of the pilot operation there have been important lessons learned that should inform future decisions on camera enforcement. In this report, the authors set out the results from the pilot areas and assess the implications for speed and red-light camera enforcement in the future.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In April 2000, a cost recovery system for speed and red-light cameras was introduced in eight pilot areas in England, Wales and Scotland. The eight areas were selected to represent a range of geographies, casualty reduction strategies and enforcement technologies. In the first two years of operations, the following results have been achieved: (1) Speed is down. Based on a large number of speed surveys vehicle speeds have dropped following the introduction of both fixed site and mobile speed cameras. The reduction in speed has been greatest in urban areas. (2) Casualties are down. Where cameras were introduced, there has been a statistically significant reduction in casualties. The greatest reduction has been in killed and serious casualties. The number of pedestrian casualties has also fallen significantly. In the last two years, killed and serious casualties at camera sites have fallen by 35% compared to the longterm trend. In terms of enforcement technology, fixed site cameras have had the greatest impact (65% reduction), and mobile speed cameras have also proved effective (29% reduction). Cameras appear to be equally effective in urban and rural areas. (3) Public reaction has been positive. Public attitude surveys indicated that the majority of the public support targeted camera enforcement. There has been significant demand locally for enforcement. In the two years of the pilot operation there have been important lessons learned that should inform future decisions on camera enforcement. In this report, the authors set out the results from the pilot areas and assess the implications for speed and red-light camera enforcement in the future.

Key concepts: Enforcement, Pedestrian, Law enforcement, Transport engineering, Red light, Geography, Business, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A COST RECOVERY SYSTEM FOR SPEED AND RED-LIGHT CAMERAS - TWO YEAR PILOT EVALUATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens