2008Unpublished venueRequires access

Kinetic responses during landings of plyometric exercises

Randall L. Jensen

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to compare landing impulse and peak ground reaction force (GRF) during a variety of plyometric exercises. Eight Division-I athletes who routinely trained plyometric exercises performed a single repetition each of countermovement jump (CMJ), drop jumps from 30 and 60 cm (DJ30 and DJ60), cone hop (CH), tuck jump (TJ), single leg CMJ (SLJ), and squat jump with 30 % 1 RM dumbbell squat (SJ30). Landing impulses and peak GRF were evaluated on an AMTI force plate. One-way ANOVA indicated mean and total impulses and peak GRF differed across exercises (p<0.05), with CH and SLJ displaying lower values and DJ30 and SJ30 having higher values. Results indicate that when landing from various plyometric exercises landing impulses and GRF are different across the exercises.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of the current study was to compare landing impulse and peak ground reaction force (GRF) during a variety of plyometric exercises. Eight Division-I athletes who routinely trained plyometric exercises performed a single repetition each of countermovement jump (CMJ), drop jumps from 30 and 60 cm (DJ30 and DJ60), cone hop (CH), tuck jump (TJ), single leg CMJ (SLJ), and squat jump with 30 % 1 RM dumbbell squat (SJ30). Landing impulses and peak GRF were evaluated on an AMTI force plate. One-way ANOVA indicated mean and total impulses and peak GRF differed across exercises (p<0.05), with CH and SLJ displaying lower values and DJ30 and SJ30 having higher values. Results indicate that when landing from various plyometric exercises landing impulses and GRF are different across the exercises.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of the current study was to compare landing impulse and peak ground reaction force (GRF) during a variety of plyometric exercises. Eight Division-I athletes who routinely trained plyometric exercises performed a single repetition each of countermovement jump (CMJ), drop jumps from 30 and 60 cm (DJ30 and DJ60), cone hop (CH), tuck jump (TJ), single leg CMJ (SLJ), and squat jump with 30 % 1 RM dumbbell squat (SJ30). Landing impulses and peak GRF were evaluated on an AMTI force plate. One-way ANOVA indicated mean and total impulses and peak GRF differed across exercises (p<0.05), with CH and SLJ displaying lower values and DJ30 and SJ30 having higher values. Results indicate that when landing from various plyometric exercises landing impulses and GRF are different across the exercises.

Key concepts: Plyometrics, Squat, Ground reaction force, Mathematics, Jump, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Physical therapy, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Kinetic responses during landings of plyometric exercises — Research Paper | ScholarLens