2009•eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)Requires access

Rhetoric: A Tale of Two Cultures

Yun Yue

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Writing is a complex process that transforms writers thought into texts. Proficiency in writing is alwaysone of essential purposes in language learning. However, mastering grammatical rules and sociolinguisticcompetence is not enough in language learning, particularly in an academic discourse. Foreignlanguage teaching tends to focus on grammatical aspects of writing. However it is very difficult for foreignlanguage learners to express their thought in completely unfamiliar rhetoric style. Therefore, contrastiverhetoric has an important role in applied linguistics. The paper initially discusses the two relatedconcepts rhetoric and contrastive rhetoric, and then analyzes the differences between Chineseand English in key rhetoric aspects such as structure of composition, individualism vs. collectivism,logical thinking vs. imagery thinking and the responsibility of writers and readers. Finally, it examinesthe implications of contrastive rhetoric in foreign language teaching and intercultural awareness

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Writing is a complex process that transforms writers thought into texts. Proficiency in writing is alwaysone of essential purposes in language learning. However, mastering grammatical rules and sociolinguisticcompetence is not enough in language learning, particularly in an academic discourse. Foreignlanguage teaching tends to focus on grammatical aspects of writing. However it is very difficult for foreignlanguage learners to express their thought in completely unfamiliar rhetoric style. Therefore, contrastiverhetoric has an important role in applied linguistics. The paper initially discusses the two relatedconcepts rhetoric and contrastive rhetoric, and then analyzes the differences between Chineseand English in key rhetoric aspects such as structure of composition, individualism vs. collectivism,logical thinking vs. imagery thinking and the responsibility of writers and readers. Finally, it examinesthe implications of contrastive rhetoric in foreign language teaching and intercultural awareness

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Writing is a complex process that transforms writers thought into texts. Proficiency in writing is alwaysone of essential purposes in language learning. However, mastering grammatical rules and sociolinguisticcompetence is not enough in language learning, particularly in an academic discourse. Foreignlanguage teaching tends to focus on grammatical aspects of writing. However it is very difficult for foreignlanguage learners to express their thought in completely unfamiliar rhetoric style. Therefore, contrastiverhetoric has an important role in applied linguistics. The paper initially discusses the two relatedconcepts rhetoric and contrastive rhetoric, and then analyzes the differences between Chineseand English in key rhetoric aspects such as structure of composition, individualism vs. collectivism,logical thinking vs. imagery thinking and the responsibility of writers and readers. Finally, it examinesthe implications of contrastive rhetoric in foreign language teaching and intercultural awareness

Key concepts: Rhetoric, Linguistics, Foreign language, Style (visual arts), Composition (language), Sociology, Psychology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rhetoric: A Tale of Two Cultures — Research Paper | ScholarLens