2015White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)Open access

Rights, responsibilities and redress? : Research on policy and practice for Roma inclusion in ten Member States: Summary Report

Philip Brown, Peter Dwyer, Philip Martin, Lisa Scullion, Hilary Turley

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The overall objective of the research element was to investigate how the national strategies for Roma integration were being operationalised and delivered within the partner states in respect of combating ‘anti-Gypsyism’. Under this broad remit the research was guided by four specific objectives: 1. To map and explore existing policies and practice for combating anti-Gypsyism and promoting social inclusion in relation to the four core areas outlined above; 2. To consider the effectiveness of existing policies and procedures in combating antiGypsyism; 3. To investigate how existing policy and procedural frameworks are operationalised in practice on the ground; and 4. To explore how policies are experienced by organisations supporting and/or representing the interests of Roma

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The overall objective of the research element was to investigate how the national strategies for Roma integration were being operationalised and delivered within the partner states in respect of combating ‘anti-Gypsyism’. Under this broad remit the research was guided by four specific objectives: 1. To map and explore existing policies and practice for combating anti-Gypsyism and promoting social inclusion in relation to the four core areas outlined above; 2. To consider the effectiveness of existing policies and procedures in combating antiGypsyism; 3. To investigate how existing policy and procedural frameworks are operationalised in practice on the ground; and 4. To explore how policies are experienced by organisations supporting and/or representing the interests of Roma

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The overall objective of the research element was to investigate how the national strategies for Roma integration were being operationalised and delivered within the partner states in respect of combating ‘anti-Gypsyism’. Under this broad remit the research was guided by four specific objectives: 1. To map and explore existing policies and practice for combating anti-Gypsyism and promoting social inclusion in relation to the four core areas outlined above; 2. To consider the effectiveness of existing policies and procedures in combating antiGypsyism; 3. To investigate how existing policy and procedural frameworks are operationalised in practice on the ground; and 4. To explore how policies are experienced by organisations supporting and/or representing the interests of Roma

Key concepts: Redress, Political science, Context (archaeology), Inclusion (mineral), Variety (cybernetics), Public relations, Commission, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rights, responsibilities and redress? : Research on policy and practice for Roma inclusion in ten Member States: Summary Report — Research Paper | ScholarLens