2004RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

How Precise are Our Estimates of the Current Output Gap? New Evidence from Multivariate Estimates for the Euro-Zone

Simon van Norden

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates the precision of multivariate models of the output gap and considers their implications for the formulation of macroeconomic policy. Multivariate models identify the gap by including information from structural economic relationships, such as Okun's Law, the Phillips Curve or a production function. Several recent papers using data for the Euro zone have concluded that multivariate state-space models produce relatively precise estimates of the current output and unemployment gap, suggesting that policy makers can improve economic outcomes by reacting more strongly to estimated gaps. This paper attempts to reconcile these finding with more pessimistic results produced from a variety of other data sets and methodologies. I argue that some of the recent optimistic conclusions are due to misinterpretation of the evidence. Updated results from existing models also imply that the precision is substantially less than indicated in earlier work. I also relax some of the untested and atheoretical modeling assumptions imposed in earlier work to reduce model misspecification risk and thereby produces more meaningful measures of uncertainty. Overall, the results are broadly consistent with the low precisionview, but confirm the apparent benefits of incorporating measures of capacity utilisation and highlight the role of model risk in production-function-based estimates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper investigates the precision of multivariate models of the output gap and considers their implications for the formulation of macroeconomic policy. Multivariate models identify the gap by including information from structural economic relationships, such as Okun's Law, the Phillips Curve or a production function. Several recent papers using data for the Euro zone have concluded that multivariate state-space models produce relatively precise estimates of the current output and unemployment gap, suggesting that policy makers can improve economic outcomes by reacting more strongly to estimated gaps. This paper attempts to reconcile these finding with more pessimistic results produced from a variety of other data sets and methodologies. I argue that some of the recent optimistic conclusions are due to misinterpretation of the evidence. Updated results from existing models also imply that the precision is substantially less than indicated in earlier work. I also relax some of the untested and atheoretical modeling assumptions imposed in earlier work to reduce model misspecification risk and thereby produces more meaningful measures of uncertainty. Overall, the results are broadly consistent with the low precisionview, but confirm the apparent benefits of incorporating measures of capacity utilisation and highlight the role of model risk in production-function-based estimates.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper investigates the precision of multivariate models of the output gap and considers their implications for the formulation of macroeconomic policy. Multivariate models identify the gap by including information from structural economic relationships, such as Okun's Law, the Phillips Curve or a production function. Several recent papers using data for the Euro zone have concluded that multivariate state-space models produce relatively precise estimates of the current output and unemployment gap, suggesting that policy makers can improve economic outcomes by reacting more strongly to estimated gaps. This paper attempts to reconcile these finding with more pessimistic results produced from a variety of other data sets and methodologies. I argue that some of the recent optimistic conclusions are due to misinterpretation of the evidence. Updated results from existing models also imply that the precision is substantially less than indicated in earlier work. I also relax some of the untested and atheoretical modeling assumptions imposed in earlier work to reduce model misspecification risk and thereby produces more meaningful measures of uncertainty. Overall, the results are broadly consistent with the low precisionview, but confirm the apparent benefits of incorporating measures of capacity utilisation and highlight the role of model risk in production-function-based estimates.

Key concepts: Multivariate statistics, Output gap, Econometrics, Potential output, Economics, Unemployment, Pessimism, Work (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How Precise are Our Estimates of the Current Output Gap? New Evidence from Multivariate Estimates for the Euro-Zone — Research Paper | ScholarLens