An evaluation of hearing-aid array processing
James M. Kates
Abstract
James M. Kates
Abstract
Among the array-processing techniques that have been proposed for hearing aids are classical delay-and-sum beamforming, superdirective arrays, and adaptive arrays. In order to directly compare the effectiveness of the different processing strategies, a 10-cm long linear array was built using five uniformly-spaced omnidirectional microphones. This array was used to acquire speech and noise signals for array placements in a representative room. The processing comparison indicates that a superdirective array is an effective processing strategy, and that the performance of adaptive arrays may not justify the additional system complexity.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Among the array-processing techniques that have been proposed for hearing aids are classical delay-and-sum beamforming, superdirective arrays, and adaptive arrays. In order to directly compare the effectiveness of the different processing strategies, a 10-cm long linear array was built using five uniformly-spaced omnidirectional microphones. This array was used to acquire speech and noise signals for array placements in a representative room. The processing comparison indicates that a superdirective array is an effective processing strategy, and that the performance of adaptive arrays may not justify the additional system complexity.
Key concepts: Array processing, Beamforming, Adaptive beamformer, Hearing aid, Omnidirectional antenna, Computer science, Array gain, Sensor array