Congress's Power to Regulate the Federal Judiciary: What the First Congress and the First Federal Courts Can Teach Today's Congress and Courts
Paul Taylor
Abstract
Open-access reader
Paul Taylor
Abstract
Open-access reader
REC. H6600 (daily ed.July 22, 2004) (statement of Rep. Nadler, opposing the bill under consideration) ("Mr.Speaker, I place into the RECORD a memo from the Congressional Research Service that says that Congress has never passed any legislation that denies to the Federal courts the jurisdiction to adjudicate the constitutionality of an act of Congress.").The debate on the House floor concerned H.R. 3313, a bill to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit federal court jurisdiction over questions under the Marriage Protection Act of 2004.See id. at H6580. 3. H.R. REP.No. 108-691, at 14-15, n.39 (2004) (citing Johnny H
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
REC. H6600 (daily ed.July 22, 2004) (statement of Rep. Nadler, opposing the bill under consideration) ("Mr.Speaker, I place into the RECORD a memo from the Congressional Research Service that says that Congress has never passed any legislation that denies to the Federal courts the jurisdiction to adjudicate the constitutionality of an act of Congress.").The debate on the House floor concerned H.R. 3313, a bill to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit federal court jurisdiction over questions under the Marriage Protection Act of 2004.See id. at H6580. 3. H.R. REP.No. 108-691, at 14-15, n.39 (2004) (citing Johnny H
Key concepts: Law, Political science, Power (physics), Quantum mechanics, Physics