2012•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

What is a 'Supreme Court of a State'?

Luke Beck

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

In Kirk v. Industrial Court of New South Wales the High Court held that it is a ‘defining characteristic’ of a state Supreme Court that it possess a judicial review jurisdiction in respect of jurisdictional errors. The High Court considered that were a state Supreme Court not to possess such a jurisdiction it would fail to meet the constitutional description ‘Supreme Court of a State’ and that, accordingly, it is beyond the legislative competence of a state parliament to deprive a state Supreme Court of that jurisdiction. This article explores the idea that state Supreme Courts possess defining characteristics and considers what other defining characteristics might be possessed by state Supreme Courts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Kirk v. Industrial Court of New South Wales the High Court held that it is a ‘defining characteristic’ of a state Supreme Court that it possess a judicial review jurisdiction in respect of jurisdictional errors. The High Court considered that were a state Supreme Court not to possess such a jurisdiction it would fail to meet the constitutional description ‘Supreme Court of a State’ and that, accordingly, it is beyond the legislative competence of a state parliament to deprive a state Supreme Court of that jurisdiction. This article explores the idea that state Supreme Courts possess defining characteristics and considers what other defining characteristics might be possessed by state Supreme Courts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Kirk v. Industrial Court of New South Wales the High Court held that it is a ‘defining characteristic’ of a state Supreme Court that it possess a judicial review jurisdiction in respect of jurisdictional errors. The High Court considered that were a state Supreme Court not to possess such a jurisdiction it would fail to meet the constitutional description ‘Supreme Court of a State’ and that, accordingly, it is beyond the legislative competence of a state parliament to deprive a state Supreme Court of that jurisdiction. This article explores the idea that state Supreme Courts possess defining characteristics and considers what other defining characteristics might be possessed by state Supreme Courts.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Original jurisdiction, Law, Political science, Jurisdiction, Certiorari, Remand (court procedure), State supreme court

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What is a 'Supreme Court of a State'? — Research Paper | ScholarLens