2014The FASEB JournalRequires access

Peripheral chemoreceptors determine the respiratory sensitivity of central chemoreceptors to CO 2 : role of carotid body CO 2 (872.3)

Curtis A. Smith, K. S. Henderson, Jerome A. Dempsey

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We have shown previously that inhibition of the isolated carotid body (CB) chemoreceptor (via CB‐specific hyperoxia & hypocapnia) markedly reduced the ventilatory response sensitivity of the central chemoreceptors to increased PaCO2 whereas stimulation (via CB‐specific hypoxia & normocapnia) markedly increased it (Blain et al., J. Physiol. 588: 2455‐2471, 2010). These findings were consistent with ventilatory hyperaddition of the CB and central chemoreceptors. We questioned whether changes in CB CO2 alone would result in similar interaction. To date, we have tested this in 4 unanesthetized and chronically instrumented dogs in which the CBs were isolated & perfused independently of the systemic circulation. CB hypocapnia (PcbCO2 ~ 20 mmHg < eupnea; PcbO2 normal) and CB hypercapnia (PcbCO2 ~ 20‐30 mmHg > eupnea; PcbO2 normal) were used to inhibit/stimulate the CB while systemic (and therefore central chemoreceptor) PCO2 was increased with 3 different levels of FICO2 in a normoxic background. We found that CB hypocapnia decreased (mean slope 34% of control), and CB hypercapnia increased (mean slope 125% of control), the ventilatory response of the central chemoreceptors to CO2. Our preliminary conclusion is that the hyperadditive CB/central interaction reported previously is independent of the stimuli used to inhibit/stimulate the CB. Grant Funding Source : Supported by NIH, NHLBI HL50531

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We have shown previously that inhibition of the isolated carotid body (CB) chemoreceptor (via CB‐specific hyperoxia & hypocapnia) markedly reduced the ventilatory response sensitivity of the central chemoreceptors to increased PaCO2 whereas stimulation (via CB‐specific hypoxia & normocapnia) markedly increased it (Blain et al., J. Physiol. 588: 2455‐2471, 2010). These findings were consistent with ventilatory hyperaddition of the CB and central chemoreceptors. We questioned whether changes in CB CO2 alone would result in similar interaction. To date, we have tested this in 4 unanesthetized and chronically instrumented dogs in which the CBs were isolated & perfused independently of the systemic circulation. CB hypocapnia (PcbCO2 ~ 20 mmHg < eupnea; PcbO2 normal) and CB hypercapnia (PcbCO2 ~ 20‐30 mmHg > eupnea; PcbO2 normal) were used to inhibit/stimulate the CB while systemic (and therefore central chemoreceptor) PCO2 was increased with 3 different levels of FICO2 in a normoxic background. We found that CB hypocapnia decreased (mean slope 34% of control), and CB hypercapnia increased (mean slope 125% of control), the ventilatory response of the central chemoreceptors to CO2. Our preliminary conclusion is that the hyperadditive CB/central interaction reported previously is independent of the stimuli used to inhibit/stimulate the CB. Grant Funding Source : Supported by NIH, NHLBI HL50531

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We have shown previously that inhibition of the isolated carotid body (CB) chemoreceptor (via CB‐specific hyperoxia & hypocapnia) markedly reduced the ventilatory response sensitivity of the central chemoreceptors to increased PaCO2 whereas stimulation (via CB‐specific hypoxia & normocapnia) markedly increased it (Blain et al., J. Physiol. 588: 2455‐2471, 2010). These findings were consistent with ventilatory hyperaddition of the CB and central chemoreceptors. We questioned whether changes in CB CO2 alone would result in similar interaction. To date, we have tested this in 4 unanesthetized and chronically instrumented dogs in which the CBs were isolated & perfused independently of the systemic circulation. CB hypocapnia (PcbCO2 ~ 20 mmHg < eupnea; PcbO2 normal) and CB hypercapnia (PcbCO2 ~ 20‐30 mmHg > eupnea; PcbO2 normal) were used to inhibit/stimulate the CB while systemic (and therefore central chemoreceptor) PCO2 was increased with 3 different levels of FICO2 in a normoxic background. We found that CB hypocapnia decreased (mean slope 34% of control), and CB hypercapnia increased (mean slope 125% of control), the ventilatory response of the central chemoreceptors to CO2. Our preliminary conclusion is that the hyperadditive CB/central interaction reported previously is independent of the stimuli used to inhibit/stimulate the CB. Grant Funding Source : Supported by NIH, NHLBI HL50531

Key concepts: Chemoreceptor, Hypocapnia, Hypercapnia, Central chemoreceptors, Carotid body, Hypoxic ventilatory response, Normocapnia, Peripheral chemoreceptors

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Peripheral chemoreceptors determine the respiratory sensitivity of central chemoreceptors to CO 2 : role of carotid body CO 2 (872.3) — Research Paper | ScholarLens