1984NematropicaOpen access

Corn and sorghum as rotational crops for management of Meloidogyne arenaria in peanut

R. Rodrı́guez-Kábana, J. T. Touchton

Open full text 22 citations

Abstract

The value of corn (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) as rotational crops for management of Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) Chitwood in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) was studied in two 3-year experiments. The experiments were conducted in a field near Headland, Alabama, and compared several rotational systems with the performance of continuous peanut. At-plant applications of ethylene dibromide (EDB) were included in some of the systems to determine the value of nematicide use in the rotations. Corn and sorghum reduced juvenile populations in soil; however, the populations recovered quickly when peanut followed either of the 2 other crops. The use of EDB to control M. arenaria in a continuous peanut system was not reliable; yield differences between fumigated and unfumigated plots under continuous peanut culture, while significant during the first year, were not so after 3 years. Highest peanut yields were obtained from plots that had been planted with corn or sorghum

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The value of corn (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) as rotational crops for management of Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) Chitwood in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) was studied in two 3-year experiments. The experiments were conducted in a field near Headland, Alabama, and compared several rotational systems with the performance of continuous peanut. At-plant applications of ethylene dibromide (EDB) were included in some of the systems to determine the value of nematicide use in the rotations. Corn and sorghum reduced juvenile populations in soil; however, the populations recovered quickly when peanut followed either of the 2 other crops. The use of EDB to control M. arenaria in a continuous peanut system was not reliable; yield differences between fumigated and unfumigated plots under continuous peanut culture, while significant during the first year, were not so after 3 years. Highest peanut yields were obtained from plots that had been planted with corn or sorghum

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The value of corn (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) as rotational crops for management of Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) Chitwood in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) was studied in two 3-year experiments. The experiments were conducted in a field near Headland, Alabama, and compared several rotational systems with the performance of continuous peanut. At-plant applications of ethylene dibromide (EDB) were included in some of the systems to determine the value of nematicide use in the rotations. Corn and sorghum reduced juvenile populations in soil; however, the populations recovered quickly when peanut followed either of the 2 other crops. The use of EDB to control M. arenaria in a continuous peanut system was not reliable; yield differences between fumigated and unfumigated plots under continuous peanut culture, while significant during the first year, were not so after 3 years. Highest peanut yields were obtained from plots that had been planted with corn or sorghum

Key concepts: Arachis hypogaea, Sorghum, Meloidogyne arenaria, Agronomy, Biology, Pendimethalin, Sweet sorghum, Weed control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Corn and sorghum as rotational crops for management of Meloidogyne arenaria in peanut — Research Paper | ScholarLens