2009•PubMedRequires access

Validation of predictive equations for glomerular filtration rate in the Saudi population.

Jamal S Al Wakeel, Durdana Hammad, Abdulkareem Al Suwaida, Nauman Tarif, Abdulrauf Chaudhary, Arthur C. Isnani, Waleed Ahmed Albedaiwi, Ahmad Hassan Mitwalli, Shaik Shaffi Ahmad

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Predictive equations provide a rapid method of assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To compare the various predictive equations for the measurement of this parameter in the Saudi population, we measured GFR by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft-Gault formulas, cystatin C, reciprocal of cystatin C, creatinine clearance, reciprocal of creatinine, and inulin clearance in 32 Saudi subjects with different stages of renal disease. We compared GFR measured by inulin clearance and the estimated GFR by the equations. The study included 19 males (59.4%) and 13 (40.6%) females with a mean age of 42.3 +/- 15.2 years and weight of 68.6 +/- 17.7 kg. The mean serum creatinine was 199 +/- 161 micromol/L. The GFR measured by inulin clearance was 50.9 +/- 33.5 mL/min, and the estimated by Cockcroft-Gault and by MDRD equations was 56.3 +/- 33.3 and 52.8 +/- 32.0 mL/min, respectively. The GFR estimated by MDRD revealed the strongest correlation with the measured inulin clearance (r= 0.976, P= 0.0000) followed by the GFR estimated by Cockcroft-Gault, serum cystatin C, and serum creatinine (r= 0.953, P= 0.0000) (r= 0.787, P= 0.0001) (r= -0.678, P= 0.001), respectively. The reciprocal of cystatin C and serum creatinine revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.826 and 0.93, respectively. Cockroft-Gault formula overestimated the GFR by 5.40 +/- 10.3 mL/min in comparison to the MDRD formula, which exhibited the best correlation with inulin clearance in different genders, age groups, body mass index, renal transplant recipients, chronic kidney disease stages when compared to other GFR predictive equations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Predictive equations provide a rapid method of assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To compare the various predictive equations for the measurement of this parameter in the Saudi population, we measured GFR by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft-Gault formulas, cystatin C, reciprocal of cystatin C, creatinine clearance, reciprocal of creatinine, and inulin clearance in 32 Saudi subjects with different stages of renal disease. We compared GFR measured by inulin clearance and the estimated GFR by the equations. The study included 19 males (59.4%) and 13 (40.6%) females with a mean age of 42.3 +/- 15.2 years and weight of 68.6 +/- 17.7 kg. The mean serum creatinine was 199 +/- 161 micromol/L. The GFR measured by inulin clearance was 50.9 +/- 33.5 mL/min, and the estimated by Cockcroft-Gault and by MDRD equations was 56.3 +/- 33.3 and 52.8 +/- 32.0 mL/min, respectively. The GFR estimated by MDRD revealed the strongest correlation with the measured inulin clearance (r= 0.976, P= 0.0000) followed by the GFR estimated by Cockcroft-Gault, serum cystatin C, and serum creatinine (r= 0.953, P= 0.0000) (r= 0.787, P= 0.0001) (r= -0.678, P= 0.001), respectively. The reciprocal of cystatin C and serum creatinine revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.826 and 0.93, respectively. Cockroft-Gault formula overestimated the GFR by 5.40 +/- 10.3 mL/min in comparison to the MDRD formula, which exhibited the best correlation with inulin clearance in different genders, age groups, body mass index, renal transplant recipients, chronic kidney disease stages when compared to other GFR predictive equations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Predictive equations provide a rapid method of assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To compare the various predictive equations for the measurement of this parameter in the Saudi population, we measured GFR by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft-Gault formulas, cystatin C, reciprocal of cystatin C, creatinine clearance, reciprocal of creatinine, and inulin clearance in 32 Saudi subjects with different stages of renal disease. We compared GFR measured by inulin clearance and the estimated GFR by the equations. The study included 19 males (59.4%) and 13 (40.6%) females with a mean age of 42.3 +/- 15.2 years and weight of 68.6 +/- 17.7 kg. The mean serum creatinine was 199 +/- 161 micromol/L. The GFR measured by inulin clearance was 50.9 +/- 33.5 mL/min, and the estimated by Cockcroft-Gault and by MDRD equations was 56.3 +/- 33.3 and 52.8 +/- 32.0 mL/min, respectively. The GFR estimated by MDRD revealed the strongest correlation with the measured inulin clearance (r= 0.976, P= 0.0000) followed by the GFR estimated by Cockcroft-Gault, serum cystatin C, and serum creatinine (r= 0.953, P= 0.0000) (r= 0.787, P= 0.0001) (r= -0.678, P= 0.001), respectively. The reciprocal of cystatin C and serum creatinine revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.826 and 0.93, respectively. Cockroft-Gault formula overestimated the GFR by 5.40 +/- 10.3 mL/min in comparison to the MDRD formula, which exhibited the best correlation with inulin clearance in different genders, age groups, body mass index, renal transplant recipients, chronic kidney disease stages when compared to other GFR predictive equations.

Key concepts: Renal function, Medicine, Cystatin C, Creatinine, Inulin, Urology, Population, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Validation of predictive equations for glomerular filtration rate in the Saudi population. — Research Paper | ScholarLens