2006•American JournalismRequires access

These Working Wives: Representation of the “Two-Job” Woman between the World Wars

Jane Marcellus

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Between 1920 and 1930, the number of married women who held paying jobs increased about 25 percent. While all employed women were controversial, married women were particularly so. The controversy intensified during the 1930s, when policies such as Section 213 of the 1932 Federal Economy Act forced many married women out of work. This paper looks at magazine coverage of the “two-job” wife, as married female workers were known. Examining popular magazines such as Ladies' Home Journal, Harper's, Forbes, and The American, as well as an alternative publication for employed women, it argues that the domestic role was reinforced, often by framing articles in terms of cultural change itself, which was seen by some as benefitting women and by others as victimizing them. Moreover, the paper supports Ruth Schwartz Cowan's argument that the “feminine mystique” was rooted in the interwar years, not the 1950s.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Between 1920 and 1930, the number of married women who held paying jobs increased about 25 percent. While all employed women were controversial, married women were particularly so. The controversy intensified during the 1930s, when policies such as Section 213 of the 1932 Federal Economy Act forced many married women out of work. This paper looks at magazine coverage of the “two-job” wife, as married female workers were known. Examining popular magazines such as Ladies' Home Journal, Harper's, Forbes, and The American, as well as an alternative publication for employed women, it argues that the domestic role was reinforced, often by framing articles in terms of cultural change itself, which was seen by some as benefitting women and by others as victimizing them. Moreover, the paper supports Ruth Schwartz Cowan's argument that the “feminine mystique” was rooted in the interwar years, not the 1950s.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Between 1920 and 1930, the number of married women who held paying jobs increased about 25 percent. While all employed women were controversial, married women were particularly so. The controversy intensified during the 1930s, when policies such as Section 213 of the 1932 Federal Economy Act forced many married women out of work. This paper looks at magazine coverage of the “two-job” wife, as married female workers were known. Examining popular magazines such as Ladies' Home Journal, Harper's, Forbes, and The American, as well as an alternative publication for employed women, it argues that the domestic role was reinforced, often by framing articles in terms of cultural change itself, which was seen by some as benefitting women and by others as victimizing them. Moreover, the paper supports Ruth Schwartz Cowan's argument that the “feminine mystique” was rooted in the interwar years, not the 1950s.

Key concepts: Representation (politics), Political science, Sociology, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
These Working Wives: Representation of the “Two-Job” Woman between the World Wars — Research Paper | ScholarLens