2008THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRYRequires access

Comparison of Behavioral Response between Intranasal and Submucosal Midazolam Adminstration

Yun‐Hee Kim, Sang‐Hyuk Jung, Kwangwoo Baek

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Purpose. The objective of this study was to evaluate the behavioral response and assess the effective- ness of additional intranasal (IN) and submucosal (SM) administration of midazolam during pediatric se- dation for dental procedure. Material and methods. Thirty-three cases of healthy (ASAⅠ), uncooperative children aged from 24 to 72 month old at pediatric dental clinic of Ewha Womans University Hospital were selected for this study. Children received oral chloral hydrate 50 mg/kg with hydroxyzine 1.0 mg/kg. After waiting for 45 minutes, midazolam 0.2 mg/kg was administrated via IN route and via SM route randomly maintaining 50% of N 2O. A pulse oximeter and a capnograph were used for measuring vital signs (SpO2, PR, RR, EtCO2) throughout the sedation. Behavioral response was evaluated as Quiet (Q), Crying (C), Movement (M) or Struggling (S) in every 2 minutes for 40 minutes. Results. There were also no statistically significant differences in vital signs of the two groups. The behavioral response for the first ten minutes during sedation was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between the two groups. After the first ten minutes, it was revealed that there was no significant difference. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that the addition of IN midazolam to the combination of oral chloral hydrate with hydroxyzine and nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation is as safe and effective as that of SM midazolam in pediatric sedation for dental procedure. Abstract 교신저자 : 백광우

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose. The objective of this study was to evaluate the behavioral response and assess the effective- ness of additional intranasal (IN) and submucosal (SM) administration of midazolam during pediatric se- dation for dental procedure. Material and methods. Thirty-three cases of healthy (ASAⅠ), uncooperative children aged from 24 to 72 month old at pediatric dental clinic of Ewha Womans University Hospital were selected for this study. Children received oral chloral hydrate 50 mg/kg with hydroxyzine 1.0 mg/kg. After waiting for 45 minutes, midazolam 0.2 mg/kg was administrated via IN route and via SM route randomly maintaining 50% of N 2O. A pulse oximeter and a capnograph were used for measuring vital signs (SpO2, PR, RR, EtCO2) throughout the sedation. Behavioral response was evaluated as Quiet (Q), Crying (C), Movement (M) or Struggling (S) in every 2 minutes for 40 minutes. Results. There were also no statistically significant differences in vital signs of the two groups. The behavioral response for the first ten minutes during sedation was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between the two groups. After the first ten minutes, it was revealed that there was no significant difference. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that the addition of IN midazolam to the combination of oral chloral hydrate with hydroxyzine and nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation is as safe and effective as that of SM midazolam in pediatric sedation for dental procedure. Abstract 교신저자 : 백광우

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose. The objective of this study was to evaluate the behavioral response and assess the effective- ness of additional intranasal (IN) and submucosal (SM) administration of midazolam during pediatric se- dation for dental procedure. Material and methods. Thirty-three cases of healthy (ASAⅠ), uncooperative children aged from 24 to 72 month old at pediatric dental clinic of Ewha Womans University Hospital were selected for this study. Children received oral chloral hydrate 50 mg/kg with hydroxyzine 1.0 mg/kg. After waiting for 45 minutes, midazolam 0.2 mg/kg was administrated via IN route and via SM route randomly maintaining 50% of N 2O. A pulse oximeter and a capnograph were used for measuring vital signs (SpO2, PR, RR, EtCO2) throughout the sedation. Behavioral response was evaluated as Quiet (Q), Crying (C), Movement (M) or Struggling (S) in every 2 minutes for 40 minutes. Results. There were also no statistically significant differences in vital signs of the two groups. The behavioral response for the first ten minutes during sedation was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between the two groups. After the first ten minutes, it was revealed that there was no significant difference. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that the addition of IN midazolam to the combination of oral chloral hydrate with hydroxyzine and nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation is as safe and effective as that of SM midazolam in pediatric sedation for dental procedure. Abstract 교신저자 : 백광우

Key concepts: Chloral hydrate, Hydroxyzine, Midazolam, Medicine, Sedation, Anesthesia, Significant difference, Crying

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Behavioral Response between Intranasal and Submucosal Midazolam Adminstration — Research Paper | ScholarLens