Remote Points in βR
Nathan J. Fine, Leonard Gillman
Abstract
Nathan J. Fine, Leonard Gillman
Abstract
The proof turns out to be considerably more difficult than anticipated. If we assume the continuum hypothesis (designated [CH]), then we can find such a point p (2.5); however, we do not know whether the continuum hypothesis is necessary. The result is obtained as a consequence of a more general theorem: for a suitably restricted class of spaces X, a point with a somewhat stronger property exists if and only if X admits an unbounded continuous function (2.3). A byproduct is: [CH] there exists a countable, completely regular space without isolated points, one of whose points is not a limit point of any discrete set (2.6).
OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The proof turns out to be considerably more difficult than anticipated. If we assume the continuum hypothesis (designated [CH]), then we can find such a point p (2.5); however, we do not know whether the continuum hypothesis is necessary. The result is obtained as a consequence of a more general theorem: for a suitably restricted class of spaces X, a point with a somewhat stronger property exists if and only if X admits an unbounded continuous function (2.3). A byproduct is: [CH] there exists a countable, completely regular space without isolated points, one of whose points is not a limit point of any discrete set (2.6).
Key concepts: Computer science, Geography