1985•Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Fort Erwin, California, Family Housing Comparison Test: Operation and Maintenance Costs of Manufactured versus Conventionally Built Units.

Robert D. Neathammer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Congress directed the construction of 200 units of manufactured/factory-built housing at Fort Irwin, CA, in 1982 to see if this method of construction will cost less than conventional housing, yet still provide durable housing commensurate with contempory housing standards. Congress directed the Department of Defense (DOD) to conduct a study to compare the operation and maintenance (O&M) costs of manufactured housing and conventional housing. DOD will report to Congressional committees on the conditions and parameters under which this test was conducted and the results of the test after it is completed in FY88. To compare these two types of construction properly, DOD must be able to identify differences in O&M costs and the reasons for those differences. This report is the first of four interim reports on the progress of the study. A yearly summary will be provided by USA-CERL for each of FY87. A final report covering the first 5 years of O&M costs will be written at the end of FY88. No conclusions or inferences should be made as to which type of construction was lowest cost until the final 5-year summary is complete.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Congress directed the construction of 200 units of manufactured/factory-built housing at Fort Irwin, CA, in 1982 to see if this method of construction will cost less than conventional housing, yet still provide durable housing commensurate with contempory housing standards. Congress directed the Department of Defense (DOD) to conduct a study to compare the operation and maintenance (O&M) costs of manufactured housing and conventional housing. DOD will report to Congressional committees on the conditions and parameters under which this test was conducted and the results of the test after it is completed in FY88. To compare these two types of construction properly, DOD must be able to identify differences in O&M costs and the reasons for those differences. This report is the first of four interim reports on the progress of the study. A yearly summary will be provided by USA-CERL for each of FY87. A final report covering the first 5 years of O&M costs will be written at the end of FY88. No conclusions or inferences should be made as to which type of construction was lowest cost until the final 5-year summary is complete.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Congress directed the construction of 200 units of manufactured/factory-built housing at Fort Irwin, CA, in 1982 to see if this method of construction will cost less than conventional housing, yet still provide durable housing commensurate with contempory housing standards. Congress directed the Department of Defense (DOD) to conduct a study to compare the operation and maintenance (O&M) costs of manufactured housing and conventional housing. DOD will report to Congressional committees on the conditions and parameters under which this test was conducted and the results of the test after it is completed in FY88. To compare these two types of construction properly, DOD must be able to identify differences in O&M costs and the reasons for those differences. This report is the first of four interim reports on the progress of the study. A yearly summary will be provided by USA-CERL for each of FY87. A final report covering the first 5 years of O&M costs will be written at the end of FY88. No conclusions or inferences should be made as to which type of construction was lowest cost until the final 5-year summary is complete.

Key concepts: Interim, Test (biology), Factory (object-oriented programming), Operations management, Engineering, Forensic engineering, Business, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fort Erwin, California, Family Housing Comparison Test: Operation and Maintenance Costs of Manufactured versus Conventionally Built Units. — Research Paper | ScholarLens