2001Unpublished venueRequires access

An Analysis of Civil Engineer Officer Contingency Training

Rusty J. Vaira

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The primary objective of this research was to investigate the current overall civil engineer officer contingency training program and determine if civil engineer officers think it is adequately preparing them to perform in a contingency environment. In accomplishing this objective, this research explored the perceptions that officers have about the contingency training that is available through three primary training programs (Home Station Training, Silver Flag training, and Civil Engineer and Services School training). The overall intent of the author was to gauge how the officers feel about their contingency training and offer some suggestions on how to improve the training. To collect data pertinent to this research, a web-based survey was developed and civil engineer (CE) officers were asked to provide answers to demographic and training perception statements. The results from this study show that from an overall perspective CE officer training is adequately preparing them to perform in a contingency environment. However, the results also indicate that there are several areas where improvements could be made to make the program even better. These improvements range from allowing more officers to attend Silver Flag training to introducing an additional contingency training course.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The primary objective of this research was to investigate the current overall civil engineer officer contingency training program and determine if civil engineer officers think it is adequately preparing them to perform in a contingency environment. In accomplishing this objective, this research explored the perceptions that officers have about the contingency training that is available through three primary training programs (Home Station Training, Silver Flag training, and Civil Engineer and Services School training). The overall intent of the author was to gauge how the officers feel about their contingency training and offer some suggestions on how to improve the training. To collect data pertinent to this research, a web-based survey was developed and civil engineer (CE) officers were asked to provide answers to demographic and training perception statements. The results from this study show that from an overall perspective CE officer training is adequately preparing them to perform in a contingency environment. However, the results also indicate that there are several areas where improvements could be made to make the program even better. These improvements range from allowing more officers to attend Silver Flag training to introducing an additional contingency training course.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The primary objective of this research was to investigate the current overall civil engineer officer contingency training program and determine if civil engineer officers think it is adequately preparing them to perform in a contingency environment. In accomplishing this objective, this research explored the perceptions that officers have about the contingency training that is available through three primary training programs (Home Station Training, Silver Flag training, and Civil Engineer and Services School training). The overall intent of the author was to gauge how the officers feel about their contingency training and offer some suggestions on how to improve the training. To collect data pertinent to this research, a web-based survey was developed and civil engineer (CE) officers were asked to provide answers to demographic and training perception statements. The results from this study show that from an overall perspective CE officer training is adequately preparing them to perform in a contingency environment. However, the results also indicate that there are several areas where improvements could be made to make the program even better. These improvements range from allowing more officers to attend Silver Flag training to introducing an additional contingency training course.

Key concepts: Officer, Contingency, Training (meteorology), Engineering, Perspective (graphical), Contingency management, Medical education, Public relations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Analysis of Civil Engineer Officer Contingency Training — Research Paper | ScholarLens