2015Chinese Journal of GeophysicsRequires access

Discussion on Several Problems in Tectono‐Thermal Modeling of Rift Basins

LIU Qiong‐Ying, Lijuan He

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Tectono‐thermal modeling of rift basin is to calculate the thermal and subsidence history of a rift basin during its formation and evolution on a lithosphere scale, which links tectonic and thermal developments perfectly. However, most extension models have the following problems: assuming the lithosphere to be 125 km thick initially, ignoring heat convection in the asthenosphere, fixing the upper boundary and rarely including thermal effects of sediments when calculating rift flank uplifts. Some effects on the tectono‐thermal modeling are discussed, including the initial crustal and lithosphere thicknesses, the convection of asthenosphere and the upper boundary of the model. We also calculate the differences of rift flank uplift between water and sediment loaded models. The tectono‐thermal modeling is based on a two‐dimensional non‐instantaneous extension model using the finite‐element method in the Lagrangian system. By solving the heat conduction equation, the thermal and tectonic subsidence histories of the basin are modeled simultaneously. The results are as follows: (1) Initial crustal and lithospheric thicknesses have great influence on tectonothermal modeling, especially on the tectonic subsidence. (2) Compared to the model ignoring heat convection in the asthenosphere, this model predicts slower tectonic subsidence and thermal decay rates, and significantly higher temperature from the lower crust to the bottom of the model. (3) The fixed or moving upper boundary during the modeling influences the calculated heat flow and tectonic subsidence in the thermal subsidence phase, and has remarkable effects on the temperature field. The effect increases with the increasing of stretching factor. (4) Rift flank uplift of the water‐loaded model would disappear within millions of years while the uplift would be stable at a certain value for the sediment‐loaded model. In cases that the initial crustal and lithospheric thicknesses are uncertain, the optimum initial thicknesses for crust and lithosphere can be determined when the calculated heat flow, Moho depth and lithospheric thickness fit observed values best. Pure heat conduction and pure heat convection in the asthenosphere are two limiting cases for extension models. Within the rheological boundary layer, heat is transferred by both conduction and convection. For strongly extensional areas, using the fixed upper boundary model would generate large calculation errors, especially in the temperature field. The thermal effect of sediment cannot be ignored when calculating the rift flank uplift.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Tectono‐thermal modeling of rift basin is to calculate the thermal and subsidence history of a rift basin during its formation and evolution on a lithosphere scale, which links tectonic and thermal developments perfectly. However, most extension models have the following problems: assuming the lithosphere to be 125 km thick initially, ignoring heat convection in the asthenosphere, fixing the upper boundary and rarely including thermal effects of sediments when calculating rift flank uplifts. Some effects on the tectono‐thermal modeling are discussed, including the initial crustal and lithosphere thicknesses, the convection of asthenosphere and the upper boundary of the model. We also calculate the differences of rift flank uplift between water and sediment loaded models. The tectono‐thermal modeling is based on a two‐dimensional non‐instantaneous extension model using the finite‐element method in the Lagrangian system. By solving the heat conduction equation, the thermal and tectonic subsidence histories of the basin are modeled simultaneously. The results are as follows: (1) Initial crustal and lithospheric thicknesses have great influence on tectonothermal modeling, especially on the tectonic subsidence. (2) Compared to the model ignoring heat convection in the asthenosphere, this model predicts slower tectonic subsidence and thermal decay rates, and significantly higher temperature from the lower crust to the bottom of the model. (3) The fixed or moving upper boundary during the modeling influences the calculated heat flow and tectonic subsidence in the thermal subsidence phase, and has remarkable effects on the temperature field. The effect increases with the increasing of stretching factor. (4) Rift flank uplift of the water‐loaded model would disappear within millions of years while the uplift would be stable at a certain value for the sediment‐loaded model. In cases that the initial crustal and lithospheric thicknesses are uncertain, the optimum initial thicknesses for crust and lithosphere can be determined when the calculated heat flow, Moho depth and lithospheric thickness fit observed values best. Pure heat conduction and pure heat convection in the asthenosphere are two limiting cases for extension models. Within the rheological boundary layer, heat is transferred by both conduction and convection. For strongly extensional areas, using the fixed upper boundary model would generate large calculation errors, especially in the temperature field. The thermal effect of sediment cannot be ignored when calculating the rift flank uplift.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Tectono‐thermal modeling of rift basin is to calculate the thermal and subsidence history of a rift basin during its formation and evolution on a lithosphere scale, which links tectonic and thermal developments perfectly. However, most extension models have the following problems: assuming the lithosphere to be 125 km thick initially, ignoring heat convection in the asthenosphere, fixing the upper boundary and rarely including thermal effects of sediments when calculating rift flank uplifts. Some effects on the tectono‐thermal modeling are discussed, including the initial crustal and lithosphere thicknesses, the convection of asthenosphere and the upper boundary of the model. We also calculate the differences of rift flank uplift between water and sediment loaded models. The tectono‐thermal modeling is based on a two‐dimensional non‐instantaneous extension model using the finite‐element method in the Lagrangian system. By solving the heat conduction equation, the thermal and tectonic subsidence histories of the basin are modeled simultaneously. The results are as follows: (1) Initial crustal and lithospheric thicknesses have great influence on tectonothermal modeling, especially on the tectonic subsidence. (2) Compared to the model ignoring heat convection in the asthenosphere, this model predicts slower tectonic subsidence and thermal decay rates, and significantly higher temperature from the lower crust to the bottom of the model. (3) The fixed or moving upper boundary during the modeling influences the calculated heat flow and tectonic subsidence in the thermal subsidence phase, and has remarkable effects on the temperature field. The effect increases with the increasing of stretching factor. (4) Rift flank uplift of the water‐loaded model would disappear within millions of years while the uplift would be stable at a certain value for the sediment‐loaded model. In cases that the initial crustal and lithospheric thicknesses are uncertain, the optimum initial thicknesses for crust and lithosphere can be determined when the calculated heat flow, Moho depth and lithospheric thickness fit observed values best. Pure heat conduction and pure heat convection in the asthenosphere are two limiting cases for extension models. Within the rheological boundary layer, heat is transferred by both conduction and convection. For strongly extensional areas, using the fixed upper boundary model would generate large calculation errors, especially in the temperature field. The thermal effect of sediment cannot be ignored when calculating the rift flank uplift.

Key concepts: Geology, Asthenosphere, Thermal subsidence, Tectonic subsidence, Lithosphere, Rift, Subsidence, Geophysics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discussion on Several Problems in Tectono‐Thermal Modeling of Rift Basins — Research Paper | ScholarLens