2009•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Social Sciences and the Democratic Ideal: From Technocracy to Dialogue

Patrick Baert, Helena Mateus Jerónimo, Alan Shipman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Social sciences were launched on a wave of expectation that scientific study of society would yield practical benefits, through improved understanding, policy and organisation. This expectation was strengthened through the twentieth century: social sciences staked out new disciplinary areas and developed distinctive methodologies (such as game theory) alongside those imported from the natural sciences. Promising transferable skills for students as well as technical insights for policy makers, they were major beneficiaries of universities' postwar expansion. But the social sciences now have a harder time selling themselves, partly because they lack any clear consensus as to the values they serve and the direction they should take. Social scientists are a dispersed group with clearly different views about what they stand for, why we should read them, and why universities and governments should continue supporting them.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Social sciences were launched on a wave of expectation that scientific study of society would yield practical benefits, through improved understanding, policy and organisation. This expectation was strengthened through the twentieth century: social sciences staked out new disciplinary areas and developed distinctive methodologies (such as game theory) alongside those imported from the natural sciences. Promising transferable skills for students as well as technical insights for policy makers, they were major beneficiaries of universities' postwar expansion. But the social sciences now have a harder time selling themselves, partly because they lack any clear consensus as to the values they serve and the direction they should take. Social scientists are a dispersed group with clearly different views about what they stand for, why we should read them, and why universities and governments should continue supporting them.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Social sciences were launched on a wave of expectation that scientific study of society would yield practical benefits, through improved understanding, policy and organisation. This expectation was strengthened through the twentieth century: social sciences staked out new disciplinary areas and developed distinctive methodologies (such as game theory) alongside those imported from the natural sciences. Promising transferable skills for students as well as technical insights for policy makers, they were major beneficiaries of universities' postwar expansion. But the social sciences now have a harder time selling themselves, partly because they lack any clear consensus as to the values they serve and the direction they should take. Social scientists are a dispersed group with clearly different views about what they stand for, why we should read them, and why universities and governments should continue supporting them.

Key concepts: Technocracy, Ideal (ethics), Democracy, Political science, Sociology, Social science, Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Social Sciences and the Democratic Ideal: From Technocracy to Dialogue — Research Paper | ScholarLens