2000RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

CITY SIZE AND PRODUCTION DIVERSITY: PATTERNS OF SPECIALISATION AND DIVERSITY IN THE US CITIES, 1969-1997

Vassilis Monastiriotis

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Research on the issue diversity and specialisation of cities over the last decade has shed new light on the "empirical regularity" of a relationship between city size and industrial diversity, identified in the early 1970s.Nevertheless, the results obtained from the theoretical models are not yet conclusive and indeed depend on the assumptions employed.Moreover, empirical research on the topic is relatively undeveloped and the stylised facts are not yet fully understood.In this paper we employ a panel data analysis for a big number (333) of US cities over a period of twenty-nine years , revealing two interesting results.First, time and city effects are highly significant.Second, while a positive relationship between size and diversity is apparent in the cross-sectional analysis, the time series and pooled investigations reveal a negative relationship.This, we interpret as evidence of the existence of a system of cities.In support to that, overall, our results suggest the existence of a complexity of mechanisms, which cannot be attributed simply to an exogenous city size effect.Under this perspective, the current theoretical advances in new economic geography seem to be the most useful tools in understanding the patterns and relationships identified in this paper.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Research on the issue diversity and specialisation of cities over the last decade has shed new light on the "empirical regularity" of a relationship between city size and industrial diversity, identified in the early 1970s.Nevertheless, the results obtained from the theoretical models are not yet conclusive and indeed depend on the assumptions employed.Moreover, empirical research on the topic is relatively undeveloped and the stylised facts are not yet fully understood.In this paper we employ a panel data analysis for a big number (333) of US cities over a period of twenty-nine years , revealing two interesting results.First, time and city effects are highly significant.Second, while a positive relationship between size and diversity is apparent in the cross-sectional analysis, the time series and pooled investigations reveal a negative relationship.This, we interpret as evidence of the existence of a system of cities.In support to that, overall, our results suggest the existence of a complexity of mechanisms, which cannot be attributed simply to an exogenous city size effect.Under this perspective, the current theoretical advances in new economic geography seem to be the most useful tools in understanding the patterns and relationships identified in this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Research on the issue diversity and specialisation of cities over the last decade has shed new light on the "empirical regularity" of a relationship between city size and industrial diversity, identified in the early 1970s.Nevertheless, the results obtained from the theoretical models are not yet conclusive and indeed depend on the assumptions employed.Moreover, empirical research on the topic is relatively undeveloped and the stylised facts are not yet fully understood.In this paper we employ a panel data analysis for a big number (333) of US cities over a period of twenty-nine years , revealing two interesting results.First, time and city effects are highly significant.Second, while a positive relationship between size and diversity is apparent in the cross-sectional analysis, the time series and pooled investigations reveal a negative relationship.This, we interpret as evidence of the existence of a system of cities.In support to that, overall, our results suggest the existence of a complexity of mechanisms, which cannot be attributed simply to an exogenous city size effect.Under this perspective, the current theoretical advances in new economic geography seem to be the most useful tools in understanding the patterns and relationships identified in this paper.

Key concepts: Diversity (politics), Economic geography, Production (economics), Geography, Economics, Political science, Law, Macroeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CITY SIZE AND PRODUCTION DIVERSITY: PATTERNS OF SPECIALISATION AND DIVERSITY IN THE US CITIES, 1969-1997 — Research Paper | ScholarLens