1993SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesRequires access

Comparison of Human and ATD Head Kinematics During Low-Speed Rearend Impacts

Michael W. Scott, Whitman E. McConnell, Herbert M. Guzman, Richard P. Howard, John B. Bomar, Harry L. Smith, James V. Benedict, James H. Raddin, Charles P. Hatsell

Open publisher page 59 citations

Abstract

The head motions of a human driver and a Hybrid III Anthropometric Test Device (ATD) right front passenger were measured in low-speed rearend impacts (velocity change (ΔV) ≤ 8 kph) with high speed film and accelerometers. Data were analyzed from three crashes with the same human driver (weight similar to ATD) at ΔV's of 3.9, 6.6 and 7.8 kph. The results indicate that the human's and ATD's head have roughly similar basic patterns of motion: a post-impact period where the head is stationary with respect to the earth (Phase I), a period where the head rotates rearward with respect to the vehicle (Phase II), a subsequent period where the head rotates forward with respect to the vehicle (Phase III) and a final period where the head settles into a post-impact rest position (Phase IV). The human's head motion tended to be more complex than the ATD's head motion during Phases II and III. These results suggest that the Hybrid III head kinematics are different from human head kinematics in the same low-speed rearend collisions and care must be used in predicting human head motion and whiplash injury potential from Hybrid III measurements in low-speed rearend impacts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The head motions of a human driver and a Hybrid III Anthropometric Test Device (ATD) right front passenger were measured in low-speed rearend impacts (velocity change (ΔV) ≤ 8 kph) with high speed film and accelerometers. Data were analyzed from three crashes with the same human driver (weight similar to ATD) at ΔV's of 3.9, 6.6 and 7.8 kph. The results indicate that the human's and ATD's head have roughly similar basic patterns of motion: a post-impact period where the head is stationary with respect to the earth (Phase I), a period where the head rotates rearward with respect to the vehicle (Phase II), a subsequent period where the head rotates forward with respect to the vehicle (Phase III) and a final period where the head settles into a post-impact rest position (Phase IV). The human's head motion tended to be more complex than the ATD's head motion during Phases II and III. These results suggest that the Hybrid III head kinematics are different from human head kinematics in the same low-speed rearend collisions and care must be used in predicting human head motion and whiplash injury potential from Hybrid III measurements in low-speed rearend impacts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The head motions of a human driver and a Hybrid III Anthropometric Test Device (ATD) right front passenger were measured in low-speed rearend impacts (velocity change (ΔV) ≤ 8 kph) with high speed film and accelerometers. Data were analyzed from three crashes with the same human driver (weight similar to ATD) at ΔV's of 3.9, 6.6 and 7.8 kph. The results indicate that the human's and ATD's head have roughly similar basic patterns of motion: a post-impact period where the head is stationary with respect to the earth (Phase I), a period where the head rotates rearward with respect to the vehicle (Phase II), a subsequent period where the head rotates forward with respect to the vehicle (Phase III) and a final period where the head settles into a post-impact rest position (Phase IV). The human's head motion tended to be more complex than the ATD's head motion during Phases II and III. These results suggest that the Hybrid III head kinematics are different from human head kinematics in the same low-speed rearend collisions and care must be used in predicting human head motion and whiplash injury potential from Hybrid III measurements in low-speed rearend impacts.

Key concepts: Kinematics, Head (geology), Computer science, Human head, Geology, Physics, Acoustics, Classical mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Human and ATD Head Kinematics During Low-Speed Rearend Impacts — Research Paper | ScholarLens