2009PubMedRequires access

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: will entecavir and telbivudine do the trick?

Anil C. Anand, P. Puri

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Rapid evolution and development in the treatment strategy of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has taken place in the last decade. Six agents have been so far approved by the FDA for the management of HBV infection including two parenteral drugs (interferon alpha2b and pegylated interferon alpha-2a) and four oral nucleotide/nucleosides (lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, and telbivudine). The two parenteral drugs have significant side effects and limited rates of HBeAg seroconversion. Lamivudine and Adefovir have been plagued by significant levels of drug resistance.The newer drugs entecavir and telbivudine have been in focus recently with claims of increased potency, with low side effects and lesser drug resistance. While these new drugs are definitely a welcome addition to the family of antiviral drugs against HBV, they are not necessarily a cure for all the evils of their predecessors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rapid evolution and development in the treatment strategy of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has taken place in the last decade. Six agents have been so far approved by the FDA for the management of HBV infection including two parenteral drugs (interferon alpha2b and pegylated interferon alpha-2a) and four oral nucleotide/nucleosides (lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, and telbivudine). The two parenteral drugs have significant side effects and limited rates of HBeAg seroconversion. Lamivudine and Adefovir have been plagued by significant levels of drug resistance.The newer drugs entecavir and telbivudine have been in focus recently with claims of increased potency, with low side effects and lesser drug resistance. While these new drugs are definitely a welcome addition to the family of antiviral drugs against HBV, they are not necessarily a cure for all the evils of their predecessors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rapid evolution and development in the treatment strategy of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has taken place in the last decade. Six agents have been so far approved by the FDA for the management of HBV infection including two parenteral drugs (interferon alpha2b and pegylated interferon alpha-2a) and four oral nucleotide/nucleosides (lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, and telbivudine). The two parenteral drugs have significant side effects and limited rates of HBeAg seroconversion. Lamivudine and Adefovir have been plagued by significant levels of drug resistance.The newer drugs entecavir and telbivudine have been in focus recently with claims of increased potency, with low side effects and lesser drug resistance. While these new drugs are definitely a welcome addition to the family of antiviral drugs against HBV, they are not necessarily a cure for all the evils of their predecessors.

Key concepts: Entecavir, Adefovir, Telbivudine, Lamivudine, Medicine, Chronic hepatitis, Drug, Drug resistance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: will entecavir and telbivudine do the trick? — Research Paper | ScholarLens