2001Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University)Open access

Workplace Justice and the Design of DisputeResolution Clauses

Bernadine Van Gramberg

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Since decentralisation of bargaining occurred in the Australian industrial relations system, dispute resolution clauses have been installed as a mandatory inclusion in awards and agreements. This article examines the development of workplace dispute resolution in Australia and argues that workplaces have an opportunity to develop dispute resolution clauses which specifically meet the workplace justice targets of procedural, distributive and interactional fairness. Four internal dispute resolution techniques are examined: the open-door policy, peer review, internal ombudsman and the consultative committee. It is argued that customised dispute resolution clauses together with the requisite training, can deliver workplace justice and cut the costs of dispute resolution.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since decentralisation of bargaining occurred in the Australian industrial relations system, dispute resolution clauses have been installed as a mandatory inclusion in awards and agreements. This article examines the development of workplace dispute resolution in Australia and argues that workplaces have an opportunity to develop dispute resolution clauses which specifically meet the workplace justice targets of procedural, distributive and interactional fairness. Four internal dispute resolution techniques are examined: the open-door policy, peer review, internal ombudsman and the consultative committee. It is argued that customised dispute resolution clauses together with the requisite training, can deliver workplace justice and cut the costs of dispute resolution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since decentralisation of bargaining occurred in the Australian industrial relations system, dispute resolution clauses have been installed as a mandatory inclusion in awards and agreements. This article examines the development of workplace dispute resolution in Australia and argues that workplaces have an opportunity to develop dispute resolution clauses which specifically meet the workplace justice targets of procedural, distributive and interactional fairness. Four internal dispute resolution techniques are examined: the open-door policy, peer review, internal ombudsman and the consultative committee. It is argued that customised dispute resolution clauses together with the requisite training, can deliver workplace justice and cut the costs of dispute resolution.

Key concepts: Dispute resolution, Alternative dispute resolution, Online dispute resolution, Dispute mechanism, Procedural justice, Economic Justice, Dispute board, Industrial relations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Workplace Justice and the Design of DisputeResolution Clauses — Research Paper | ScholarLens