2004•PubMedOpen access

Erectile dysfunction: clinical guidelines (1).

Mohammad Reza Safarinejad, Seyedyousef Hosseini

Open full text 15 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: According to a survey, the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, 52% of men beyond 40 years of age may have some degrees of erectile failure, and it is projected to affect 322 million men worldwide by 2025. We present a framework for the evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of the male patient who presents with erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using the MEDLINE database for all articles from 1975 through 2004 on male sexual dysfunction and the most pertinent articles are discussed. RESULTS: Remarkable progress has been made in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Erectile dysfunction is a common condition associated with aging, chronic illnesses and various modifiable risk factors. Erectile dysfunction can be due to vasculogenic, neurogenic, hormonal, and/or psychogenic factors as well as alterations in the nitric oxide/cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway or other regulatory mechanisms. The number of consultations from new patients presenting with erectile dysfunction and resulting costs for health care systems are increasing. Urologist should be the evaluating physician who supervises the surgical, medical, and hormonal treatment and who refers the patient, as necessary, to other members of the multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSION: Erectile dysfunction has a significant negative impact on quality of life. Male sexual dysfunction, especially erectile dysfunction, necessitates a comprehensive medical and psychologic evaluation involving both partners. All possible risk factors should be outlined and corrected, when feasible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: According to a survey, the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, 52% of men beyond 40 years of age may have some degrees of erectile failure, and it is projected to affect 322 million men worldwide by 2025. We present a framework for the evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of the male patient who presents with erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using the MEDLINE database for all articles from 1975 through 2004 on male sexual dysfunction and the most pertinent articles are discussed. RESULTS: Remarkable progress has been made in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Erectile dysfunction is a common condition associated with aging, chronic illnesses and various modifiable risk factors. Erectile dysfunction can be due to vasculogenic, neurogenic, hormonal, and/or psychogenic factors as well as alterations in the nitric oxide/cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway or other regulatory mechanisms. The number of consultations from new patients presenting with erectile dysfunction and resulting costs for health care systems are increasing. Urologist should be the evaluating physician who supervises the surgical, medical, and hormonal treatment and who refers the patient, as necessary, to other members of the multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSION: Erectile dysfunction has a significant negative impact on quality of life. Male sexual dysfunction, especially erectile dysfunction, necessitates a comprehensive medical and psychologic evaluation involving both partners. All possible risk factors should be outlined and corrected, when feasible.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: According to a survey, the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, 52% of men beyond 40 years of age may have some degrees of erectile failure, and it is projected to affect 322 million men worldwide by 2025. We present a framework for the evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of the male patient who presents with erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using the MEDLINE database for all articles from 1975 through 2004 on male sexual dysfunction and the most pertinent articles are discussed. RESULTS: Remarkable progress has been made in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Erectile dysfunction is a common condition associated with aging, chronic illnesses and various modifiable risk factors. Erectile dysfunction can be due to vasculogenic, neurogenic, hormonal, and/or psychogenic factors as well as alterations in the nitric oxide/cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway or other regulatory mechanisms. The number of consultations from new patients presenting with erectile dysfunction and resulting costs for health care systems are increasing. Urologist should be the evaluating physician who supervises the surgical, medical, and hormonal treatment and who refers the patient, as necessary, to other members of the multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSION: Erectile dysfunction has a significant negative impact on quality of life. Male sexual dysfunction, especially erectile dysfunction, necessitates a comprehensive medical and psychologic evaluation involving both partners. All possible risk factors should be outlined and corrected, when feasible.

Key concepts: Erectile dysfunction, Medicine, Psychogenic disease, Sexual dysfunction, Quality of life (healthcare), Cyclic guanosine monophosphate, Intensive care medicine, Gynecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Erectile dysfunction: clinical guidelines (1). — Research Paper | ScholarLens