2015Journal of selçuk üniversity natural and applied scienceRequires access

Is Real GDP Stationary In The Advanced Economies? Evidence From An Unbalanced Panel Unit Root Test

Emrah Hanifi Fırat, Nurhan Halisdemir, Mehmet Gürcan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study deals with the unit root hypothesis related to the real GDP (Gross Domestic Product) for 35 advanced economies, for the period of 1960 -2011. As it is known in the literature, when unit root analysis, which plays a significant role in specifying the macroeconomic time series’ resistance to policy alternatives, is made without considering the panel structure (and the findings of the existence of unit root have been achieved in many of such single stationarity studies), available data set diminishes the power and reliability of the test. Therefore it is necessary to search the existence of unit root with the panel-based method. The Im, Pesaran and Shin (1997, 2003 (revised version) panel unit root test, which allows the application of unit root analysis for heterogeneous panel, was implemented upon the advanced countries for the period in question, and the null hypothesis that panel members included unit root could not be refuted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study deals with the unit root hypothesis related to the real GDP (Gross Domestic Product) for 35 advanced economies, for the period of 1960 -2011. As it is known in the literature, when unit root analysis, which plays a significant role in specifying the macroeconomic time series’ resistance to policy alternatives, is made without considering the panel structure (and the findings of the existence of unit root have been achieved in many of such single stationarity studies), available data set diminishes the power and reliability of the test. Therefore it is necessary to search the existence of unit root with the panel-based method. The Im, Pesaran and Shin (1997, 2003 (revised version) panel unit root test, which allows the application of unit root analysis for heterogeneous panel, was implemented upon the advanced countries for the period in question, and the null hypothesis that panel members included unit root could not be refuted.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study deals with the unit root hypothesis related to the real GDP (Gross Domestic Product) for 35 advanced economies, for the period of 1960 -2011. As it is known in the literature, when unit root analysis, which plays a significant role in specifying the macroeconomic time series’ resistance to policy alternatives, is made without considering the panel structure (and the findings of the existence of unit root have been achieved in many of such single stationarity studies), available data set diminishes the power and reliability of the test. Therefore it is necessary to search the existence of unit root with the panel-based method. The Im, Pesaran and Shin (1997, 2003 (revised version) panel unit root test, which allows the application of unit root analysis for heterogeneous panel, was implemented upon the advanced countries for the period in question, and the null hypothesis that panel members included unit root could not be refuted.

Key concepts: Unit root, Unit root test, Panel data, Econometrics, Root (linguistics), Economics, Unit (ring theory), Null hypothesis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is Real GDP Stationary In The Advanced Economies? Evidence From An Unbalanced Panel Unit Root Test — Research Paper | ScholarLens