2007RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library)Requires access

Anti-elitism and Shifting Realism: Putting Communication and Politics into Accounts of 'the People'

Cathy Greenfield

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This article centrally reviews two recent books, one Australian and one from the United States, which deal with populism. To situate their arguments within a wider consideration of populism and collective social actors, it also introduces and uses elements of a recent article by Latour on conceptions of politics. The article begins by placing its observations on populism within the context, particularly Australian, of both populist politicians and some of the earlier work done by scholars of populism, registering the issue of what drives the need to return yet again to what appears a perennial, even obvious, element of modern political landscapes. Some central issues are established in the description and analysis of populism - eschewing ideology critique; treating populism as a political form and what this means; and deploying the categories of 'the people' and 'the population' - in order to guide discussion and assess the usefulness of the works under review.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article centrally reviews two recent books, one Australian and one from the United States, which deal with populism. To situate their arguments within a wider consideration of populism and collective social actors, it also introduces and uses elements of a recent article by Latour on conceptions of politics. The article begins by placing its observations on populism within the context, particularly Australian, of both populist politicians and some of the earlier work done by scholars of populism, registering the issue of what drives the need to return yet again to what appears a perennial, even obvious, element of modern political landscapes. Some central issues are established in the description and analysis of populism - eschewing ideology critique; treating populism as a political form and what this means; and deploying the categories of 'the people' and 'the population' - in order to guide discussion and assess the usefulness of the works under review.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article centrally reviews two recent books, one Australian and one from the United States, which deal with populism. To situate their arguments within a wider consideration of populism and collective social actors, it also introduces and uses elements of a recent article by Latour on conceptions of politics. The article begins by placing its observations on populism within the context, particularly Australian, of both populist politicians and some of the earlier work done by scholars of populism, registering the issue of what drives the need to return yet again to what appears a perennial, even obvious, element of modern political landscapes. Some central issues are established in the description and analysis of populism - eschewing ideology critique; treating populism as a political form and what this means; and deploying the categories of 'the people' and 'the population' - in order to guide discussion and assess the usefulness of the works under review.

Key concepts: Populism, Elitism, Politics, Ideology, Realism, Sociology, Context (archaeology), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Anti-elitism and Shifting Realism: Putting Communication and Politics into Accounts of 'the People' — Research Paper | ScholarLens