2003Research in labor economicsOpen access

JOB LOSS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1981–2001

Henry S. Farber

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

I examine changes in the incidence and consequences of job loss between 1981 and 2001 using data from the Displaced Workers Surveys (DWS) from 1984-2002.The overall rate of job loss has a strong counter-cyclical component, but the job loss rate was higher than might have been expected during the mid-1990's given the strong labor market during that period.While the job loss rate of more-educated workers increased, less-educated workers continue to have the highest rates of job loss overall.Displaced workers have a substantially reduced probability of employment and an increased probability of part-time employment subsequent to job loss.The more educated have higher post-displacement employment rates and are more likely to be employed full-time.The probabilities of employment and full-time employment among those reemployed subsequent to job loss increased substantially in the late 1990s, suggesting that the strong labor market eased the transition of displaced workers.Reemployment rates dropped sharply in the recession of 2001.Those re-employed, even full-time and regardless of education level, suffer significant earnings declines relative to what they earned before they were displaced.Additionally, foregone earnings growth (the growth in earnings that would have occurred had the workers not been displaced), is an important part of the cost of job loss for re-employed full-time job losers.There is no evidence of a decline during the tight labor market of the 1990s in the earnings loss of displaced workers who were reemployed full-time.In fact, earnings losses of displaced workers have been increasing since the mid 1990s.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I examine changes in the incidence and consequences of job loss between 1981 and 2001 using data from the Displaced Workers Surveys (DWS) from 1984-2002.The overall rate of job loss has a strong counter-cyclical component, but the job loss rate was higher than might have been expected during the mid-1990's given the strong labor market during that period.While the job loss rate of more-educated workers increased, less-educated workers continue to have the highest rates of job loss overall.Displaced workers have a substantially reduced probability of employment and an increased probability of part-time employment subsequent to job loss.The more educated have higher post-displacement employment rates and are more likely to be employed full-time.The probabilities of employment and full-time employment among those reemployed subsequent to job loss increased substantially in the late 1990s, suggesting that the strong labor market eased the transition of displaced workers.Reemployment rates dropped sharply in the recession of 2001.Those re-employed, even full-time and regardless of education level, suffer significant earnings declines relative to what they earned before they were displaced.Additionally, foregone earnings growth (the growth in earnings that would have occurred had the workers not been displaced), is an important part of the cost of job loss for re-employed full-time job losers.There is no evidence of a decline during the tight labor market of the 1990s in the earnings loss of displaced workers who were reemployed full-time.In fact, earnings losses of displaced workers have been increasing since the mid 1990s.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I examine changes in the incidence and consequences of job loss between 1981 and 2001 using data from the Displaced Workers Surveys (DWS) from 1984-2002.The overall rate of job loss has a strong counter-cyclical component, but the job loss rate was higher than might have been expected during the mid-1990's given the strong labor market during that period.While the job loss rate of more-educated workers increased, less-educated workers continue to have the highest rates of job loss overall.Displaced workers have a substantially reduced probability of employment and an increased probability of part-time employment subsequent to job loss.The more educated have higher post-displacement employment rates and are more likely to be employed full-time.The probabilities of employment and full-time employment among those reemployed subsequent to job loss increased substantially in the late 1990s, suggesting that the strong labor market eased the transition of displaced workers.Reemployment rates dropped sharply in the recession of 2001.Those re-employed, even full-time and regardless of education level, suffer significant earnings declines relative to what they earned before they were displaced.Additionally, foregone earnings growth (the growth in earnings that would have occurred had the workers not been displaced), is an important part of the cost of job loss for re-employed full-time job losers.There is no evidence of a decline during the tight labor market of the 1990s in the earnings loss of displaced workers who were reemployed full-time.In fact, earnings losses of displaced workers have been increasing since the mid 1990s.

Key concepts: Job loss, Earnings, Displaced workers, Labour economics, Economics, Demographic economics, Earnings growth, Unemployment

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
JOB LOSS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1981–2001 — Research Paper | ScholarLens