2014•LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Open access

Management non-profit organizations: an assessment of performance through the balanced scorecard

Jorge Assef Lutif Júnior, Jamerson Viegas Queıroz, Hélio Roberto Hékis, Fernanda Cristina Barbosa Pereira Queiroz, Nilton César Lima, Marciano Furukava

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The methodology Balanced Scorecard (BSC) focuses on the major critical issues of modern organizations, whether with or without profit. The measurement of the effective performance of the latter is by evaluating the successfulimplementation of organizational strategy. The main results of the proposed approach refers to evaluation of overall scores for each dimension of the BSC methodology, financial, customer, internal processes, learning and growth. These results are able to help the organization evaluate and revise their strategy and, in general, to adopt management methods more accurately. The findings highlight on balancing and alignment of strategic objectives, low causality map, strategic communication insufficient and fragmented. Theperformance indicators portray more meritocracy operational procedures of social projects in the context of the Strategic Map determined in a short-term over the long term. However, there is evidence of improved performancemanagement and strategic taken as a basis of planning as both the strategic map structured. Therefore, the nonprofits need to adopt a form of management that enables planning, setting objectives and targets that provide the continuity of its activities, and generating instruments that can measure the financial performance and non-financial, in order to develop strategic actions for growth and sustainability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The methodology Balanced Scorecard (BSC) focuses on the major critical issues of modern organizations, whether with or without profit. The measurement of the effective performance of the latter is by evaluating the successfulimplementation of organizational strategy. The main results of the proposed approach refers to evaluation of overall scores for each dimension of the BSC methodology, financial, customer, internal processes, learning and growth. These results are able to help the organization evaluate and revise their strategy and, in general, to adopt management methods more accurately. The findings highlight on balancing and alignment of strategic objectives, low causality map, strategic communication insufficient and fragmented. Theperformance indicators portray more meritocracy operational procedures of social projects in the context of the Strategic Map determined in a short-term over the long term. However, there is evidence of improved performancemanagement and strategic taken as a basis of planning as both the strategic map structured. Therefore, the nonprofits need to adopt a form of management that enables planning, setting objectives and targets that provide the continuity of its activities, and generating instruments that can measure the financial performance and non-financial, in order to develop strategic actions for growth and sustainability.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The methodology Balanced Scorecard (BSC) focuses on the major critical issues of modern organizations, whether with or without profit. The measurement of the effective performance of the latter is by evaluating the successfulimplementation of organizational strategy. The main results of the proposed approach refers to evaluation of overall scores for each dimension of the BSC methodology, financial, customer, internal processes, learning and growth. These results are able to help the organization evaluate and revise their strategy and, in general, to adopt management methods more accurately. The findings highlight on balancing and alignment of strategic objectives, low causality map, strategic communication insufficient and fragmented. Theperformance indicators portray more meritocracy operational procedures of social projects in the context of the Strategic Map determined in a short-term over the long term. However, there is evidence of improved performancemanagement and strategic taken as a basis of planning as both the strategic map structured. Therefore, the nonprofits need to adopt a form of management that enables planning, setting objectives and targets that provide the continuity of its activities, and generating instruments that can measure the financial performance and non-financial, in order to develop strategic actions for growth and sustainability.

Key concepts: Balanced scorecard, Business, Process management, Performance management, Profit (economics), Operations management, Industrial organization, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Management non-profit organizations: an assessment of performance through the balanced scorecard — Research Paper | ScholarLens