2005•AIP conference proceedingsRequires access

The Locations and Shapes of Jupiter’s Bow Shock and Magnetopause

Raymond J. Walker

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The shape and location of the Jovian bow shock and magnetopause have been studied by using magnetic field observations and global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations. MHD simulations in which the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) was set to zero were used to define the boundary shapes and positions and how they depend on solar wind dynamic pressure. Polynomial fits to the simulated boundaries along with spacecraft observations were used to determine the probability of a given position being outside of the bow shock or inside of the magnetopause. The magnetopause and possibly the bow shock have two preferred locations, one representing a compressed magnetosphere and the other an expanded magnetosphere. Variations in the solar wind parameters near Jupiter also show a bimodal distribution but the changes in the solar wind dynamic pressure are not sufficient to account for the observed bimodal distribution of observed magnetopause positions. Internal pressure changes at Jupiter are required. The interplanetary magnetic field also influences the location and shape of the boundaries. In particular, when the IMF is in the By direction or northward magnetopause reconnection acts to reduce polar flattening. Higher internal pressure at dusk leads to a dawn‐dusk asymmetry in the magnetopause position with the boundary being farther from Jupiter on the dusk side. For all the simulations the ratio of the bow shock stand‐off distance to that of the magnetopause was less than that at the Earth.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The shape and location of the Jovian bow shock and magnetopause have been studied by using magnetic field observations and global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations. MHD simulations in which the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) was set to zero were used to define the boundary shapes and positions and how they depend on solar wind dynamic pressure. Polynomial fits to the simulated boundaries along with spacecraft observations were used to determine the probability of a given position being outside of the bow shock or inside of the magnetopause. The magnetopause and possibly the bow shock have two preferred locations, one representing a compressed magnetosphere and the other an expanded magnetosphere. Variations in the solar wind parameters near Jupiter also show a bimodal distribution but the changes in the solar wind dynamic pressure are not sufficient to account for the observed bimodal distribution of observed magnetopause positions. Internal pressure changes at Jupiter are required. The interplanetary magnetic field also influences the location and shape of the boundaries. In particular, when the IMF is in the By direction or northward magnetopause reconnection acts to reduce polar flattening. Higher internal pressure at dusk leads to a dawn‐dusk asymmetry in the magnetopause position with the boundary being farther from Jupiter on the dusk side. For all the simulations the ratio of the bow shock stand‐off distance to that of the magnetopause was less than that at the Earth.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The shape and location of the Jovian bow shock and magnetopause have been studied by using magnetic field observations and global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations. MHD simulations in which the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) was set to zero were used to define the boundary shapes and positions and how they depend on solar wind dynamic pressure. Polynomial fits to the simulated boundaries along with spacecraft observations were used to determine the probability of a given position being outside of the bow shock or inside of the magnetopause. The magnetopause and possibly the bow shock have two preferred locations, one representing a compressed magnetosphere and the other an expanded magnetosphere. Variations in the solar wind parameters near Jupiter also show a bimodal distribution but the changes in the solar wind dynamic pressure are not sufficient to account for the observed bimodal distribution of observed magnetopause positions. Internal pressure changes at Jupiter are required. The interplanetary magnetic field also influences the location and shape of the boundaries. In particular, when the IMF is in the By direction or northward magnetopause reconnection acts to reduce polar flattening. Higher internal pressure at dusk leads to a dawn‐dusk asymmetry in the magnetopause position with the boundary being farther from Jupiter on the dusk side. For all the simulations the ratio of the bow shock stand‐off distance to that of the magnetopause was less than that at the Earth.

Key concepts: Magnetopause, Bow shock (aerodynamics), Magnetosheath, Magnetosphere, Solar wind, Physics, Geophysics, Magnetosphere of Jupiter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Locations and Shapes of Jupiter’s Bow Shock and Magnetopause — Research Paper | ScholarLens