ON THE MYTH OF AN ANCIENT CHINESE THEOREM ABOUT PRIMALITY
Qi Han, Man‐Keung Siu
Abstract
Open-access reader
Qi Han, Man‐Keung Siu
Abstract
Open-access reader
In the western world there is this myth that the ancient Chinese knew a special case of Fermat's Little Theorem and erroneously took it as a criterion for primality, namely, that $n$ is a prime if and only if $2^{n-]} -1$ is divisible by $n$. This article discusses how this myth might have come about, in particular tells the story of an investigation on number theory by Li Shanlan in the mid $19^{\rm th}$ century. The discussion touches upon the social history of the incident in connection with the polarized attitude different foreigners took towards Chinese mathematics at the time.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the western world there is this myth that the ancient Chinese knew a special case of Fermat's Little Theorem and erroneously took it as a criterion for primality, namely, that $n$ is a prime if and only if $2^{n-]} -1$ is divisible by $n$. This article discusses how this myth might have come about, in particular tells the story of an investigation on number theory by Li Shanlan in the mid $19^{\rm th}$ century. The discussion touches upon the social history of the incident in connection with the polarized attitude different foreigners took towards Chinese mathematics at the time.
Key concepts: Primality test, Fermat's Last Theorem, Mythology, Mathematics, Connection (principal bundle), Prime (order theory), Number theory, Algebra over a field