2012•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Broken Punishment Networks in Public Goods Games: Experimental Evidence

Andreas Leibbrandt, Abhijit Ramalingam, Lauri Sääksvuori, James Martin Walker

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Abundant evidence suggests that high levels of contributions to public goods can be sustained through\nself-governed monitoring and sanctions. This experimental study investigates the effectiveness of\ndecentralized sanctioning institutions where punishment opportunities are restricted to agents who are\nlinked through alternative punishment networks. We find that the structure of the punishment network\nsignificantly impacts contributions to the public good, but not overall efficiencies. Contributions collapse\nover decision rounds in groups with limited punishment opportunities, even if the absolute punishment\ncapacity corresponds to the complete punishment network where all agents are allowed to punish each\nother. However, after allowing for the costs of sanctions, efficiencies are similar across the different\nnetworks that allow for punishment and the no-punishment network.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abundant evidence suggests that high levels of contributions to public goods can be sustained through\nself-governed monitoring and sanctions. This experimental study investigates the effectiveness of\ndecentralized sanctioning institutions where punishment opportunities are restricted to agents who are\nlinked through alternative punishment networks. We find that the structure of the punishment network\nsignificantly impacts contributions to the public good, but not overall efficiencies. Contributions collapse\nover decision rounds in groups with limited punishment opportunities, even if the absolute punishment\ncapacity corresponds to the complete punishment network where all agents are allowed to punish each\nother. However, after allowing for the costs of sanctions, efficiencies are similar across the different\nnetworks that allow for punishment and the no-punishment network.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abundant evidence suggests that high levels of contributions to public goods can be sustained through\nself-governed monitoring and sanctions. This experimental study investigates the effectiveness of\ndecentralized sanctioning institutions where punishment opportunities are restricted to agents who are\nlinked through alternative punishment networks. We find that the structure of the punishment network\nsignificantly impacts contributions to the public good, but not overall efficiencies. Contributions collapse\nover decision rounds in groups with limited punishment opportunities, even if the absolute punishment\ncapacity corresponds to the complete punishment network where all agents are allowed to punish each\nother. However, after allowing for the costs of sanctions, efficiencies are similar across the different\nnetworks that allow for punishment and the no-punishment network.

Key concepts: Punishment (psychology), Sanctions, Public good, Public goods game, Microeconomics, Economics, Public economics, Criminology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Broken Punishment Networks in Public Goods Games: Experimental Evidence — Research Paper | ScholarLens