The Spot market and chaotic contract formation – a few reflections on a challenge to modern legal systems
Johanna Hjalmarsson
Abstract
Johanna Hjalmarsson
Abstract
Is classic contract theory compatible with modern methods of contract making? In many markets for commodities, shipping and - perhaps ironically - insurance, contract formation takes place at a great distance, between parties who have not previously met or done business and who are in a hurry to fix the deal, while happy to dispense with lawyers and detailed consideration of agreements. Contract making also takes place by an extended process of offers, counter-offers, exchanges of standard terms and more or less vaguely worded acceptances. Notoriously, the common law does not include subsequent conduct among the facts indicating whether a contract was in fact concluded – it is only indicative of whether that party thought a contract had been concluded. How can one party therefore be sure that a contract has been put in place and how is it to dare act in reliance thereupon, perhaps incurring expenses and liabilities in so doing?
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Is classic contract theory compatible with modern methods of contract making? In many markets for commodities, shipping and - perhaps ironically - insurance, contract formation takes place at a great distance, between parties who have not previously met or done business and who are in a hurry to fix the deal, while happy to dispense with lawyers and detailed consideration of agreements. Contract making also takes place by an extended process of offers, counter-offers, exchanges of standard terms and more or less vaguely worded acceptances. Notoriously, the common law does not include subsequent conduct among the facts indicating whether a contract was in fact concluded – it is only indicative of whether that party thought a contract had been concluded. How can one party therefore be sure that a contract has been put in place and how is it to dare act in reliance thereupon, perhaps incurring expenses and liabilities in so doing?
Key concepts: Severability, Business, Law and economics, Privity of contract, Contract management, Contract theory, Exclusion clause, Unconscionability