2014•ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)Requires access

The Spot market and chaotic contract formation – a few reflections on a challenge to modern legal systems

Johanna Hjalmarsson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Is classic contract theory compatible with modern methods of contract making? In many markets for commodities, shipping and - perhaps ironically - insurance, contract formation takes place at a great distance, between parties who have not previously met or done business and who are in a hurry to fix the deal, while happy to dispense with lawyers and detailed consideration of agreements. Contract making also takes place by an extended process of offers, counter-offers, exchanges of standard terms and more or less vaguely worded acceptances. Notoriously, the common law does not include subsequent conduct among the facts indicating whether a contract was in fact concluded – it is only indicative of whether that party thought a contract had been concluded. How can one party therefore be sure that a contract has been put in place and how is it to dare act in reliance thereupon, perhaps incurring expenses and liabilities in so doing?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Is classic contract theory compatible with modern methods of contract making? In many markets for commodities, shipping and - perhaps ironically - insurance, contract formation takes place at a great distance, between parties who have not previously met or done business and who are in a hurry to fix the deal, while happy to dispense with lawyers and detailed consideration of agreements. Contract making also takes place by an extended process of offers, counter-offers, exchanges of standard terms and more or less vaguely worded acceptances. Notoriously, the common law does not include subsequent conduct among the facts indicating whether a contract was in fact concluded – it is only indicative of whether that party thought a contract had been concluded. How can one party therefore be sure that a contract has been put in place and how is it to dare act in reliance thereupon, perhaps incurring expenses and liabilities in so doing?

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Is classic contract theory compatible with modern methods of contract making? In many markets for commodities, shipping and - perhaps ironically - insurance, contract formation takes place at a great distance, between parties who have not previously met or done business and who are in a hurry to fix the deal, while happy to dispense with lawyers and detailed consideration of agreements. Contract making also takes place by an extended process of offers, counter-offers, exchanges of standard terms and more or less vaguely worded acceptances. Notoriously, the common law does not include subsequent conduct among the facts indicating whether a contract was in fact concluded – it is only indicative of whether that party thought a contract had been concluded. How can one party therefore be sure that a contract has been put in place and how is it to dare act in reliance thereupon, perhaps incurring expenses and liabilities in so doing?

Key concepts: Severability, Business, Law and economics, Privity of contract, Contract management, Contract theory, Exclusion clause, Unconscionability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Spot market and chaotic contract formation – a few reflections on a challenge to modern legal systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens