2002•Socialist registerRequires access

Making Poverty Work

Paul J. Cammack

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The international development community, led by the World Bank, has recently committed itself to the abolition of poverty; and the World Bank has set out, in its most recent World Development Report, Attacking Poverty, the means by which the target of reducing the proportion of people living in absolute poverty by half by 2015 is to be achieved. Indeed, the website of the World Bank Group now proclaims: 'Our Dream Is A World Free of Poverty'. Rather than dismiss this as a flight of fancy, we should ask why the claim is made, and why it is the World Bank that makes it. The answer touches on two key contradictions in global capitalism--its need to represent the interests of a single class as those of society as a whole, reflected today in the systematic effort to present as benevolent a neoliberal revolution intended to deliver people everywhere into the clutches of capital; and its need to operate as a single system across a fragmented world of competing states with no overarching political authority, reflected today in the search for international regimes and organizations through which the global system might be managed. The World Bank's affected concern for poverty, I argue, is a response to the combined effects of these two contradictions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The international development community, led by the World Bank, has recently committed itself to the abolition of poverty; and the World Bank has set out, in its most recent World Development Report, Attacking Poverty, the means by which the target of reducing the proportion of people living in absolute poverty by half by 2015 is to be achieved. Indeed, the website of the World Bank Group now proclaims: 'Our Dream Is A World Free of Poverty'. Rather than dismiss this as a flight of fancy, we should ask why the claim is made, and why it is the World Bank that makes it. The answer touches on two key contradictions in global capitalism--its need to represent the interests of a single class as those of society as a whole, reflected today in the systematic effort to present as benevolent a neoliberal revolution intended to deliver people everywhere into the clutches of capital; and its need to operate as a single system across a fragmented world of competing states with no overarching political authority, reflected today in the search for international regimes and organizations through which the global system might be managed. The World Bank's affected concern for poverty, I argue, is a response to the combined effects of these two contradictions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The international development community, led by the World Bank, has recently committed itself to the abolition of poverty; and the World Bank has set out, in its most recent World Development Report, Attacking Poverty, the means by which the target of reducing the proportion of people living in absolute poverty by half by 2015 is to be achieved. Indeed, the website of the World Bank Group now proclaims: 'Our Dream Is A World Free of Poverty'. Rather than dismiss this as a flight of fancy, we should ask why the claim is made, and why it is the World Bank that makes it. The answer touches on two key contradictions in global capitalism--its need to represent the interests of a single class as those of society as a whole, reflected today in the systematic effort to present as benevolent a neoliberal revolution intended to deliver people everywhere into the clutches of capital; and its need to operate as a single system across a fragmented world of competing states with no overarching political authority, reflected today in the search for international regimes and organizations through which the global system might be managed. The World Bank's affected concern for poverty, I argue, is a response to the combined effects of these two contradictions.

Key concepts: Poverty, Capitalism, Culture of poverty, Politics, Extreme poverty, Capital (architecture), World community, Political economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Making Poverty Work — Research Paper | ScholarLens