2014Constructivist FoundationsRequires access

When Theoretical Frameworks Collide

Diane Laflamme

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Urrestarazu’s presentation of social autopoiesis is compromised because he fails to take into account that social systems are meaning-constituting systems. The paper briefly comments on Luhmann…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Urrestarazu’s presentation of social autopoiesis is compromised because he fails to take into account that social systems are meaning-constituting systems. The paper briefly comments on Luhmann…

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Urrestarazu’s presentation of social autopoiesis is compromised because he fails to take into account that social systems are meaning-constituting systems. The paper briefly comments on Luhmann…

Key concepts: Enactivism, Neurophenomenology, Autopoiesis, Constructivism (international relations), Epistemology, Computer science, Cognitive science, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
When Theoretical Frameworks Collide — Research Paper | ScholarLens