1998RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Monetary Policy and the Real Exchange Rate: Some Evidence

John E. Floyd

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the effects on real exchange rates of exogenous money supply shocks. Such shocks are conventionally associated with monetary policy, although they may also arise from shifts in the desired reserve to deposit ratio of the banking system or in the public's desired currency to deposit ratio. They necessarily involve nominal exchange rate movements and, given price rigidity, real exchange rate movements as well. No evidence is found that unanticipated money shocks affected real exchange rates in nine major industrial countries during the flexible exchange rate period that began with the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. Real shocks related to technological change, real income cycles, commodity market developments and, quite possibly, government fiscal policies explain virtually all the variability of real exchange rates. An extensive search also finds no evidence that real exchange rates were affected by anticipated money shocks. Since all sensible theories of real exchange rate behavior hold that exogenous unanticipated money shocks will necessarily affect real exchange rates, we are left with the conclusion that observed high-frequency monetary shocks are endogenously determined responses of the authorities to stochastic shocks to the demand for nominal money holdings associated with interest rate and exchange rate speculation and other factors. The evidence suggests that the authorities did a sufficiently good, though imperfect, job of smoothing financial markets to render the relationship between the real exchange rate and observed stochastic unanticipated money supply shocks statistically insignificant after other factors are taken into account.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines the effects on real exchange rates of exogenous money supply shocks. Such shocks are conventionally associated with monetary policy, although they may also arise from shifts in the desired reserve to deposit ratio of the banking system or in the public's desired currency to deposit ratio. They necessarily involve nominal exchange rate movements and, given price rigidity, real exchange rate movements as well. No evidence is found that unanticipated money shocks affected real exchange rates in nine major industrial countries during the flexible exchange rate period that began with the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. Real shocks related to technological change, real income cycles, commodity market developments and, quite possibly, government fiscal policies explain virtually all the variability of real exchange rates. An extensive search also finds no evidence that real exchange rates were affected by anticipated money shocks. Since all sensible theories of real exchange rate behavior hold that exogenous unanticipated money shocks will necessarily affect real exchange rates, we are left with the conclusion that observed high-frequency monetary shocks are endogenously determined responses of the authorities to stochastic shocks to the demand for nominal money holdings associated with interest rate and exchange rate speculation and other factors. The evidence suggests that the authorities did a sufficiently good, though imperfect, job of smoothing financial markets to render the relationship between the real exchange rate and observed stochastic unanticipated money supply shocks statistically insignificant after other factors are taken into account.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines the effects on real exchange rates of exogenous money supply shocks. Such shocks are conventionally associated with monetary policy, although they may also arise from shifts in the desired reserve to deposit ratio of the banking system or in the public's desired currency to deposit ratio. They necessarily involve nominal exchange rate movements and, given price rigidity, real exchange rate movements as well. No evidence is found that unanticipated money shocks affected real exchange rates in nine major industrial countries during the flexible exchange rate period that began with the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. Real shocks related to technological change, real income cycles, commodity market developments and, quite possibly, government fiscal policies explain virtually all the variability of real exchange rates. An extensive search also finds no evidence that real exchange rates were affected by anticipated money shocks. Since all sensible theories of real exchange rate behavior hold that exogenous unanticipated money shocks will necessarily affect real exchange rates, we are left with the conclusion that observed high-frequency monetary shocks are endogenously determined responses of the authorities to stochastic shocks to the demand for nominal money holdings associated with interest rate and exchange rate speculation and other factors. The evidence suggests that the authorities did a sufficiently good, though imperfect, job of smoothing financial markets to render the relationship between the real exchange rate and observed stochastic unanticipated money supply shocks statistically insignificant after other factors are taken into account.

Key concepts: Economics, Exchange rate, Monetary economics, Monetary policy, Money supply, Currency, Interest rate parity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Monetary Policy and the Real Exchange Rate: Some Evidence — Research Paper | ScholarLens