2009•DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)Open access

Electoral institutions and government performance

Rory F. O'Sullivan

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Thesis (M.P.P.)--Georgetown University, 2009.; Includes bibliographical references.; Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format. This paper will analyze the effect of electoral institutions on state government performance. I hypothesize that states with popular initiatives and referenda, term limits, and legislatively drawn electoral districts will have poorer levels of government management than states without them. I expect the reverse to be true of states with open primaries, namely that they will have better managed government. Government performance is operationalized through the Pew Center's extensive survey grading each state government. Using both ordered probit and ordinary least squared regression I test the effect of electoral institutions and demographic control variables on state government performance. The model suggests that open primaries and term limits improve government management while popular initiatives and legislative re-districting reduce government performance.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thesis (M.P.P.)--Georgetown University, 2009.; Includes bibliographical references.; Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format. This paper will analyze the effect of electoral institutions on state government performance. I hypothesize that states with popular initiatives and referenda, term limits, and legislatively drawn electoral districts will have poorer levels of government management than states without them. I expect the reverse to be true of states with open primaries, namely that they will have better managed government. Government performance is operationalized through the Pew Center's extensive survey grading each state government. Using both ordered probit and ordinary least squared regression I test the effect of electoral institutions and demographic control variables on state government performance. The model suggests that open primaries and term limits improve government management while popular initiatives and legislative re-districting reduce government performance.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thesis (M.P.P.)--Georgetown University, 2009.; Includes bibliographical references.; Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format. This paper will analyze the effect of electoral institutions on state government performance. I hypothesize that states with popular initiatives and referenda, term limits, and legislatively drawn electoral districts will have poorer levels of government management than states without them. I expect the reverse to be true of states with open primaries, namely that they will have better managed government. Government performance is operationalized through the Pew Center's extensive survey grading each state government. Using both ordered probit and ordinary least squared regression I test the effect of electoral institutions and demographic control variables on state government performance. The model suggests that open primaries and term limits improve government management while popular initiatives and legislative re-districting reduce government performance.

Key concepts: Probit model, Operationalization, Government (linguistics), Legislature, Public administration, State (computer science), Grading (engineering), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electoral institutions and government performance — Research Paper | ScholarLens