1979PubMedRequires access

Orally induced tolerance.

C S Henney

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Sir: A number of investigators have recently reported that cell membranes, or solubilized proteins derived from them, are capable of inducing cytotoxic responses in secondary cultures (1–6). They have implied thereby that they are gaining insight into the specificity of the structures recognized by cytotoxic T cells. An alternative interpretation seems equally plausible: that the membrane preparations act not directly on cytotoxic memory cells, but rather on helper T cells, which, by secreting soluble mediators, “trigger” cytotoxic cell differentiation. This interpretation is supported by several recent reports. Thus, Ryser et al. (7), Wagner and Rollinghoff (8), and this laboratory (Okada et al. , in press) have shown that cell mediators secreted by primed Lyt I+ T cells can cause the direct differentiation of cytotoxic T cells in secondary (memory) cultures. Moreover, the specificity of the cytotoxic cells induced by these mediators is that of the antigen initially used for priming.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sir: A number of investigators have recently reported that cell membranes, or solubilized proteins derived from them, are capable of inducing cytotoxic responses in secondary cultures (1–6). They have implied thereby that they are gaining insight into the specificity of the structures recognized by cytotoxic T cells. An alternative interpretation seems equally plausible: that the membrane preparations act not directly on cytotoxic memory cells, but rather on helper T cells, which, by secreting soluble mediators, “trigger” cytotoxic cell differentiation. This interpretation is supported by several recent reports. Thus, Ryser et al. (7), Wagner and Rollinghoff (8), and this laboratory (Okada et al. , in press) have shown that cell mediators secreted by primed Lyt I+ T cells can cause the direct differentiation of cytotoxic T cells in secondary (memory) cultures. Moreover, the specificity of the cytotoxic cells induced by these mediators is that of the antigen initially used for priming.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sir: A number of investigators have recently reported that cell membranes, or solubilized proteins derived from them, are capable of inducing cytotoxic responses in secondary cultures (1–6). They have implied thereby that they are gaining insight into the specificity of the structures recognized by cytotoxic T cells. An alternative interpretation seems equally plausible: that the membrane preparations act not directly on cytotoxic memory cells, but rather on helper T cells, which, by secreting soluble mediators, “trigger” cytotoxic cell differentiation. This interpretation is supported by several recent reports. Thus, Ryser et al. (7), Wagner and Rollinghoff (8), and this laboratory (Okada et al. , in press) have shown that cell mediators secreted by primed Lyt I+ T cells can cause the direct differentiation of cytotoxic T cells in secondary (memory) cultures. Moreover, the specificity of the cytotoxic cells induced by these mediators is that of the antigen initially used for priming.

Key concepts: Cytotoxic T cell, Priming (agriculture), Biology, Cell biology, Immunology, Chemistry, In vitro, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Orally induced tolerance. — Research Paper | ScholarLens