2011RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions: Chapter 5 (Scale, Timing, Length and Inter-Dependencies in Project Selection)

Glenn P. Jenkins, Chun‐Yan Kuo, Arnold C. Harberger

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

It is generally agreed that a project's net present value (NPV) is the most important criterion for the financial and the economic evaluation of a project from either the owner's or economic perspective. The NPV criterion requires that a project analyst recommend only projects with positive NPV. The next step is to endeavor to maximize the NPV. The reason for trying to maximize the NPV is to extract as much value from the project as possible. Ideally, we should strive to maximize the NPV of incremental net cash flows or net economic benefits. Of course, optimization cannot be pursued blindly; there may be repercussions for other stakeholders that need to be considered in the final decision making. There are other important considerations project analysts often encounter. These considerations include changes in project parameters like the scale of investment, the date of initiation of a project, the length of project life or interdependencies of project components. Each of them is addressed in this chapter by using the criterion of a project's net present value. This chapter explains how project analysts use the criterion of a project's net present value to make such decisions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is generally agreed that a project's net present value (NPV) is the most important criterion for the financial and the economic evaluation of a project from either the owner's or economic perspective. The NPV criterion requires that a project analyst recommend only projects with positive NPV. The next step is to endeavor to maximize the NPV. The reason for trying to maximize the NPV is to extract as much value from the project as possible. Ideally, we should strive to maximize the NPV of incremental net cash flows or net economic benefits. Of course, optimization cannot be pursued blindly; there may be repercussions for other stakeholders that need to be considered in the final decision making. There are other important considerations project analysts often encounter. These considerations include changes in project parameters like the scale of investment, the date of initiation of a project, the length of project life or interdependencies of project components. Each of them is addressed in this chapter by using the criterion of a project's net present value. This chapter explains how project analysts use the criterion of a project's net present value to make such decisions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is generally agreed that a project's net present value (NPV) is the most important criterion for the financial and the economic evaluation of a project from either the owner's or economic perspective. The NPV criterion requires that a project analyst recommend only projects with positive NPV. The next step is to endeavor to maximize the NPV. The reason for trying to maximize the NPV is to extract as much value from the project as possible. Ideally, we should strive to maximize the NPV of incremental net cash flows or net economic benefits. Of course, optimization cannot be pursued blindly; there may be repercussions for other stakeholders that need to be considered in the final decision making. There are other important considerations project analysts often encounter. These considerations include changes in project parameters like the scale of investment, the date of initiation of a project, the length of project life or interdependencies of project components. Each of them is addressed in this chapter by using the criterion of a project's net present value. This chapter explains how project analysts use the criterion of a project's net present value to make such decisions.

Key concepts: Net present value, Present value, Cash flow, Interdependence, Capital budgeting, Project planning, Project management triangle, Project management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions: Chapter 5 (Scale, Timing, Length and Inter-Dependencies in Project Selection) — Research Paper | ScholarLens