1930•The Journal of ImmunologyRequires access

Hypersensitiveness to Diphtheria Bacterial Products Anaphylactic Reactions of Antitoxic Immune Guinea Pigs

James M. Neill, John Y. Sugg, Lurline V. Richardson

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Summary This paper reports the anaphylactic reactions of guinea pigs immunized with toxoid and subsequently injected intravenously either with phenolized filtrate containing the toxin antigen or with formolized filtrate containing the toxoid antigen. It was proved that the acute death of the antitoxic immune animals represented true anaphylactic reactions specific to bacterial products contained in diphtheria filtrate. While it was recognized that other constituents participate to some extent, the evidence as a whole indicated that the toxin or toxoid antigen is the principal agent of the anaphylactic reaction of antitoxic immune guinea pigs to unheated filtrates containing a relatively large proportion of toxin or toxoid. The complications due to the substances other than toxin or toxoid are least prominent if one uses both for the immunization and for the intravenous test, minimal amounts of unheated filtrate in which toxoid is the dominant antigen, and finally selects for intravenous test the individual guinea pigs that had been “earliest” in antitoxin production. As might be expected, the complications become more prominent if either the immunization or the intravenous anaphylaxis test is made with diphtheria filtrate in which toxin or toxoid is not the dominant antigen (e.g., filtrates of weakly toxicogenic strains or heated filtrates of toxicogenic strains). Most of the experiments were made with toxoid-immunized guinea pigs, but after a proper rest period animals immunized with toxin-antitoxin gave anaphylactic reactions to intravenous injection of formolized toxoid-containing filtrates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary This paper reports the anaphylactic reactions of guinea pigs immunized with toxoid and subsequently injected intravenously either with phenolized filtrate containing the toxin antigen or with formolized filtrate containing the toxoid antigen. It was proved that the acute death of the antitoxic immune animals represented true anaphylactic reactions specific to bacterial products contained in diphtheria filtrate. While it was recognized that other constituents participate to some extent, the evidence as a whole indicated that the toxin or toxoid antigen is the principal agent of the anaphylactic reaction of antitoxic immune guinea pigs to unheated filtrates containing a relatively large proportion of toxin or toxoid. The complications due to the substances other than toxin or toxoid are least prominent if one uses both for the immunization and for the intravenous test, minimal amounts of unheated filtrate in which toxoid is the dominant antigen, and finally selects for intravenous test the individual guinea pigs that had been “earliest” in antitoxin production. As might be expected, the complications become more prominent if either the immunization or the intravenous anaphylaxis test is made with diphtheria filtrate in which toxin or toxoid is not the dominant antigen (e.g., filtrates of weakly toxicogenic strains or heated filtrates of toxicogenic strains). Most of the experiments were made with toxoid-immunized guinea pigs, but after a proper rest period animals immunized with toxin-antitoxin gave anaphylactic reactions to intravenous injection of formolized toxoid-containing filtrates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary This paper reports the anaphylactic reactions of guinea pigs immunized with toxoid and subsequently injected intravenously either with phenolized filtrate containing the toxin antigen or with formolized filtrate containing the toxoid antigen. It was proved that the acute death of the antitoxic immune animals represented true anaphylactic reactions specific to bacterial products contained in diphtheria filtrate. While it was recognized that other constituents participate to some extent, the evidence as a whole indicated that the toxin or toxoid antigen is the principal agent of the anaphylactic reaction of antitoxic immune guinea pigs to unheated filtrates containing a relatively large proportion of toxin or toxoid. The complications due to the substances other than toxin or toxoid are least prominent if one uses both for the immunization and for the intravenous test, minimal amounts of unheated filtrate in which toxoid is the dominant antigen, and finally selects for intravenous test the individual guinea pigs that had been “earliest” in antitoxin production. As might be expected, the complications become more prominent if either the immunization or the intravenous anaphylaxis test is made with diphtheria filtrate in which toxin or toxoid is not the dominant antigen (e.g., filtrates of weakly toxicogenic strains or heated filtrates of toxicogenic strains). Most of the experiments were made with toxoid-immunized guinea pigs, but after a proper rest period animals immunized with toxin-antitoxin gave anaphylactic reactions to intravenous injection of formolized toxoid-containing filtrates.

Key concepts: Toxoid, Antitoxin, Diphtheria toxin, Diphtheria, Toxin, Antigen, Microbiology, Immunization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hypersensitiveness to Diphtheria Bacterial Products Anaphylactic Reactions of Antitoxic Immune Guinea Pigs — Research Paper | ScholarLens