U.S. Employment and Training Programs and Performance Standards System Design
Pascal Courty, Carolyn J. Heinrich, Gerald Marschke, Jeffrey Andrew Smith
Abstract
Pascal Courty, Carolyn J. Heinrich, Gerald Marschke, Jeffrey Andrew Smith
Abstract
A number of recently implemented reforms to public sector incentive systems have sought to reorient them toward a focus on measuring results and inducing public agencies to become more effi cient, responsive, and accountable to the public.They share at least two features.The fi rst is a system of performance measures and standards designed to create clear expectations for government performance and to assess results.A second feature is a means for rewarding individuals, teams, or entire organizations for achievement relative to the established performance goals, primarily through budgetary allocations.By clearly defi ning goals and developing explicit rewards for their attainment, these systems have aimed to replicate, in a nonmarket setting, the incentive structures, competition, and resulting high performance and effi ciency of private markets (Light 2005).Among its fi rst steps in advancing these reforms, the Obama administration has required federal agencies to identify a limited number of high-priority performance goals for which performance trends will be tracked, and through its new Open Government initiative, it will make these data publicly available and promote the use of new methods in the analysis of them.The government is also now compelling the private sector to provide more information on its performance for transparency and accountability (beyond longer-standing areas of public scrutiny such as health care and the environment), and has devised incentives for cooperation and penalties for withholding information (Cukier 2010).For example, it is now possible for the public to get sta-
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A number of recently implemented reforms to public sector incentive systems have sought to reorient them toward a focus on measuring results and inducing public agencies to become more effi cient, responsive, and accountable to the public.They share at least two features.The fi rst is a system of performance measures and standards designed to create clear expectations for government performance and to assess results.A second feature is a means for rewarding individuals, teams, or entire organizations for achievement relative to the established performance goals, primarily through budgetary allocations.By clearly defi ning goals and developing explicit rewards for their attainment, these systems have aimed to replicate, in a nonmarket setting, the incentive structures, competition, and resulting high performance and effi ciency of private markets (Light 2005).Among its fi rst steps in advancing these reforms, the Obama administration has required federal agencies to identify a limited number of high-priority performance goals for which performance trends will be tracked, and through its new Open Government initiative, it will make these data publicly available and promote the use of new methods in the analysis of them.The government is also now compelling the private sector to provide more information on its performance for transparency and accountability (beyond longer-standing areas of public scrutiny such as health care and the environment), and has devised incentives for cooperation and penalties for withholding information (Cukier 2010).For example, it is now possible for the public to get sta-
Key concepts: Training (meteorology), Computer science, Geography, Meteorology