2011•Unpublished venueOpen access

U.S. Employment and Training Programs and Performance Standards System Design

Pascal Courty, Carolyn J. Heinrich, Gerald Marschke, Jeffrey Andrew Smith

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

A number of recently implemented reforms to public sector incentive systems have sought to reorient them toward a focus on measuring results and inducing public agencies to become more effi cient, responsive, and accountable to the public.They share at least two features.The fi rst is a system of performance measures and standards designed to create clear expectations for government performance and to assess results.A second feature is a means for rewarding individuals, teams, or entire organizations for achievement relative to the established performance goals, primarily through budgetary allocations.By clearly defi ning goals and developing explicit rewards for their attainment, these systems have aimed to replicate, in a nonmarket setting, the incentive structures, competition, and resulting high performance and effi ciency of private markets (Light 2005).Among its fi rst steps in advancing these reforms, the Obama administration has required federal agencies to identify a limited number of high-priority performance goals for which performance trends will be tracked, and through its new Open Government initiative, it will make these data publicly available and promote the use of new methods in the analysis of them.The government is also now compelling the private sector to provide more information on its performance for transparency and accountability (beyond longer-standing areas of public scrutiny such as health care and the environment), and has devised incentives for cooperation and penalties for withholding information (Cukier 2010).For example, it is now possible for the public to get sta-

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of recently implemented reforms to public sector incentive systems have sought to reorient them toward a focus on measuring results and inducing public agencies to become more effi cient, responsive, and accountable to the public.They share at least two features.The fi rst is a system of performance measures and standards designed to create clear expectations for government performance and to assess results.A second feature is a means for rewarding individuals, teams, or entire organizations for achievement relative to the established performance goals, primarily through budgetary allocations.By clearly defi ning goals and developing explicit rewards for their attainment, these systems have aimed to replicate, in a nonmarket setting, the incentive structures, competition, and resulting high performance and effi ciency of private markets (Light 2005).Among its fi rst steps in advancing these reforms, the Obama administration has required federal agencies to identify a limited number of high-priority performance goals for which performance trends will be tracked, and through its new Open Government initiative, it will make these data publicly available and promote the use of new methods in the analysis of them.The government is also now compelling the private sector to provide more information on its performance for transparency and accountability (beyond longer-standing areas of public scrutiny such as health care and the environment), and has devised incentives for cooperation and penalties for withholding information (Cukier 2010).For example, it is now possible for the public to get sta-

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of recently implemented reforms to public sector incentive systems have sought to reorient them toward a focus on measuring results and inducing public agencies to become more effi cient, responsive, and accountable to the public.They share at least two features.The fi rst is a system of performance measures and standards designed to create clear expectations for government performance and to assess results.A second feature is a means for rewarding individuals, teams, or entire organizations for achievement relative to the established performance goals, primarily through budgetary allocations.By clearly defi ning goals and developing explicit rewards for their attainment, these systems have aimed to replicate, in a nonmarket setting, the incentive structures, competition, and resulting high performance and effi ciency of private markets (Light 2005).Among its fi rst steps in advancing these reforms, the Obama administration has required federal agencies to identify a limited number of high-priority performance goals for which performance trends will be tracked, and through its new Open Government initiative, it will make these data publicly available and promote the use of new methods in the analysis of them.The government is also now compelling the private sector to provide more information on its performance for transparency and accountability (beyond longer-standing areas of public scrutiny such as health care and the environment), and has devised incentives for cooperation and penalties for withholding information (Cukier 2010).For example, it is now possible for the public to get sta-

Key concepts: Training (meteorology), Computer science, Geography, Meteorology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
U.S. Employment and Training Programs and Performance Standards System Design — Research Paper | ScholarLens