1996•Intelligent Transportation: Realizing the Benefits. Proceedings of the 1996 Annual Meeting of ITS America.ITS AmericaRequires access

ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SYSTEMS IN PUBLIC TRANSIT

Michael Dinning, John S. Collura

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Many public transit operators in the United States are planning integrated, automatic fare collection systems (AFC). Like automated toll collection systems, AFC Systems in public transit are part of the family of electronic payment systems envisioned in the Intelligent Transportation System architecture. An integrated AFC system typically uses advanced technology (e.g. magnetic stripe or smart cards) to collect fare payments electronically on two or more transit related modes (e.g. bus, rail, parking). Integrated AFC systems can result in many types of benefits for passengers and transit operators, including increases in revenue, reductions in operating expenses, and enhancements in security, equity, and quality of transit service. The objectives of this paper are threefold: 1) to briefly review several initiatives underway in the U.S. to design and implement integrated, automatic fare collection systems, 2) to examine the motivational factors and projected benefits which have provided the impetus for these AFC initiatives; and 3) to identify and discuss the institutional and organizational issues associated with the implementation of integrated payment systems in the U.S. and the strategies employed to resolve these issues.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many public transit operators in the United States are planning integrated, automatic fare collection systems (AFC). Like automated toll collection systems, AFC Systems in public transit are part of the family of electronic payment systems envisioned in the Intelligent Transportation System architecture. An integrated AFC system typically uses advanced technology (e.g. magnetic stripe or smart cards) to collect fare payments electronically on two or more transit related modes (e.g. bus, rail, parking). Integrated AFC systems can result in many types of benefits for passengers and transit operators, including increases in revenue, reductions in operating expenses, and enhancements in security, equity, and quality of transit service. The objectives of this paper are threefold: 1) to briefly review several initiatives underway in the U.S. to design and implement integrated, automatic fare collection systems, 2) to examine the motivational factors and projected benefits which have provided the impetus for these AFC initiatives; and 3) to identify and discuss the institutional and organizational issues associated with the implementation of integrated payment systems in the U.S. and the strategies employed to resolve these issues.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many public transit operators in the United States are planning integrated, automatic fare collection systems (AFC). Like automated toll collection systems, AFC Systems in public transit are part of the family of electronic payment systems envisioned in the Intelligent Transportation System architecture. An integrated AFC system typically uses advanced technology (e.g. magnetic stripe or smart cards) to collect fare payments electronically on two or more transit related modes (e.g. bus, rail, parking). Integrated AFC systems can result in many types of benefits for passengers and transit operators, including increases in revenue, reductions in operating expenses, and enhancements in security, equity, and quality of transit service. The objectives of this paper are threefold: 1) to briefly review several initiatives underway in the U.S. to design and implement integrated, automatic fare collection systems, 2) to examine the motivational factors and projected benefits which have provided the impetus for these AFC initiatives; and 3) to identify and discuss the institutional and organizational issues associated with the implementation of integrated payment systems in the U.S. and the strategies employed to resolve these issues.

Key concepts: Public transport, Payment, Transit (satellite), Revenue, Smart card, Electronic toll collection, Business, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SYSTEMS IN PUBLIC TRANSIT — Research Paper | ScholarLens