2003Research Online (University of Wollongong)Open access

Collaborative Design Projects: Evaluating Students' Online Discussions

Sarah Roslyn Lambert

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

This paper reports on the author’s work to evaluate student online discussion, a learning tool used in a face-to-face graphic design subject centred around a collaborative design project. A modified teaching and learning model with new online resources was trialled with approx 45 undergraduate design students in session 1 of 2003. The 4 students in each project team were allocated a specific role based on contemporary design studio practice. An online discussion space was set up for each project team. A number of evaluation techniques were used including a content analysis of online discussion postings on which this paper focuses. Results show that, within the context of a collaborative task supported by clear team roles, the discussion space effectively scaffolded engagement, team development, communication, feedback and problem solving. While useful trends have been noted, the evaluation model used was not sufficient to explain variations to trends. The evaluation methodology needs to be modified for blended teaching model to include analysis of both face-to-face and online activity.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper reports on the author’s work to evaluate student online discussion, a learning tool used in a face-to-face graphic design subject centred around a collaborative design project. A modified teaching and learning model with new online resources was trialled with approx 45 undergraduate design students in session 1 of 2003. The 4 students in each project team were allocated a specific role based on contemporary design studio practice. An online discussion space was set up for each project team. A number of evaluation techniques were used including a content analysis of online discussion postings on which this paper focuses. Results show that, within the context of a collaborative task supported by clear team roles, the discussion space effectively scaffolded engagement, team development, communication, feedback and problem solving. While useful trends have been noted, the evaluation model used was not sufficient to explain variations to trends. The evaluation methodology needs to be modified for blended teaching model to include analysis of both face-to-face and online activity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper reports on the author’s work to evaluate student online discussion, a learning tool used in a face-to-face graphic design subject centred around a collaborative design project. A modified teaching and learning model with new online resources was trialled with approx 45 undergraduate design students in session 1 of 2003. The 4 students in each project team were allocated a specific role based on contemporary design studio practice. An online discussion space was set up for each project team. A number of evaluation techniques were used including a content analysis of online discussion postings on which this paper focuses. Results show that, within the context of a collaborative task supported by clear team roles, the discussion space effectively scaffolded engagement, team development, communication, feedback and problem solving. While useful trends have been noted, the evaluation model used was not sufficient to explain variations to trends. The evaluation methodology needs to be modified for blended teaching model to include analysis of both face-to-face and online activity.

Key concepts: Context (archaeology), Session (web analytics), Task (project management), Computer science, Set (abstract data type), Space (punctuation), Online discussion, Collaborative learning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Collaborative Design Projects: Evaluating Students' Online Discussions — Research Paper | ScholarLens