1996Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Measuring changes in economic welfare: consumer and producer surplus

Caroline L. Dinwiddy, Francis Teal

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The object of this book is to consider the general principles underlying social cost-benefit analysis and to discuss the application of those principles to project appraisal and policy evaluation in developing countries. Social cost-benefit analysis is concerned with the evaluation of policies, programmes or projects by governments or public sector agencies. The general procedure for such an analysis is to consider the costs and benefits of a given policy measure – for instance, a tariff reform, a fertiliser subsidy for farmers, the construction of a cement factory or a rural health clinic – and to compare the benefits with the costs. The difficulty of evaluating social costs and benefits will vary with the project: the social value could simply be the real value of the physical inputs and outputs of a proposed manufacturing plant, or the costs and benefits may be intangible ones, such as the environmental costs of pollution or the benefits from improved health services. Whatever the problems of evaluation, the underlying principle is the same in all contexts: if the benefits exceed the costs, then the project is deemed socially worthwhile. As a general statement of principle, the view that the benefits from public sector intervention should exceed the costs would appear to be self-evident. Closer consideration, however, reveals that a formal cost-benefit analysis involves making value judgements which are not necessarily uncontroversial.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The object of this book is to consider the general principles underlying social cost-benefit analysis and to discuss the application of those principles to project appraisal and policy evaluation in developing countries. Social cost-benefit analysis is concerned with the evaluation of policies, programmes or projects by governments or public sector agencies. The general procedure for such an analysis is to consider the costs and benefits of a given policy measure – for instance, a tariff reform, a fertiliser subsidy for farmers, the construction of a cement factory or a rural health clinic – and to compare the benefits with the costs. The difficulty of evaluating social costs and benefits will vary with the project: the social value could simply be the real value of the physical inputs and outputs of a proposed manufacturing plant, or the costs and benefits may be intangible ones, such as the environmental costs of pollution or the benefits from improved health services. Whatever the problems of evaluation, the underlying principle is the same in all contexts: if the benefits exceed the costs, then the project is deemed socially worthwhile. As a general statement of principle, the view that the benefits from public sector intervention should exceed the costs would appear to be self-evident. Closer consideration, however, reveals that a formal cost-benefit analysis involves making value judgements which are not necessarily uncontroversial.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The object of this book is to consider the general principles underlying social cost-benefit analysis and to discuss the application of those principles to project appraisal and policy evaluation in developing countries. Social cost-benefit analysis is concerned with the evaluation of policies, programmes or projects by governments or public sector agencies. The general procedure for such an analysis is to consider the costs and benefits of a given policy measure – for instance, a tariff reform, a fertiliser subsidy for farmers, the construction of a cement factory or a rural health clinic – and to compare the benefits with the costs. The difficulty of evaluating social costs and benefits will vary with the project: the social value could simply be the real value of the physical inputs and outputs of a proposed manufacturing plant, or the costs and benefits may be intangible ones, such as the environmental costs of pollution or the benefits from improved health services. Whatever the problems of evaluation, the underlying principle is the same in all contexts: if the benefits exceed the costs, then the project is deemed socially worthwhile. As a general statement of principle, the view that the benefits from public sector intervention should exceed the costs would appear to be self-evident. Closer consideration, however, reveals that a formal cost-benefit analysis involves making value judgements which are not necessarily uncontroversial.

Key concepts: Economic surplus, Economic welfare, Welfare, Economics, Consumer welfare, Natural resource economics, Business, Agricultural economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measuring changes in economic welfare: consumer and producer surplus — Research Paper | ScholarLens