1940Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace TechnologyRequires access

Optimum Climb to Height

J. Corner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

TWO distinct types of climb arise in aviation. In the first, it is necessary to climb to a given height without attaching any importance to horizontal distance covered. An example is a climb to take up patrol at a given height. Obviously the quickest way to do this is to climb at the maximum rate of climb possible at each instant. The second type of climb is more important. In this it is necessary to climb to cruising height while, at the same time, travelling as far as possible in a certain horizontal direction. Examples are the initial climb of transport 'planes and bombers, and the “chasing climb” of a fighter which has taken off to pursue an enemy. It seems possible that the first type of climb is not the best in this case; a flatter climb, such as that shown dotted in Fig. 1, may have a horizontal speed sufficiently great to more than compensate for the extra time required to reach cruising height—vertical distances are exaggerated to show more clearly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

TWO distinct types of climb arise in aviation. In the first, it is necessary to climb to a given height without attaching any importance to horizontal distance covered. An example is a climb to take up patrol at a given height. Obviously the quickest way to do this is to climb at the maximum rate of climb possible at each instant. The second type of climb is more important. In this it is necessary to climb to cruising height while, at the same time, travelling as far as possible in a certain horizontal direction. Examples are the initial climb of transport 'planes and bombers, and the “chasing climb” of a fighter which has taken off to pursue an enemy. It seems possible that the first type of climb is not the best in this case; a flatter climb, such as that shown dotted in Fig. 1, may have a horizontal speed sufficiently great to more than compensate for the extra time required to reach cruising height—vertical distances are exaggerated to show more clearly.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

TWO distinct types of climb arise in aviation. In the first, it is necessary to climb to a given height without attaching any importance to horizontal distance covered. An example is a climb to take up patrol at a given height. Obviously the quickest way to do this is to climb at the maximum rate of climb possible at each instant. The second type of climb is more important. In this it is necessary to climb to cruising height while, at the same time, travelling as far as possible in a certain horizontal direction. Examples are the initial climb of transport 'planes and bombers, and the “chasing climb” of a fighter which has taken off to pursue an enemy. It seems possible that the first type of climb is not the best in this case; a flatter climb, such as that shown dotted in Fig. 1, may have a horizontal speed sufficiently great to more than compensate for the extra time required to reach cruising height—vertical distances are exaggerated to show more clearly.

Key concepts: Climb, Geodesy, Aeronautics, Aerospace engineering, Engineering, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Optimum Climb to Height — Research Paper | ScholarLens